← Back to orders

LR97-13

IRAC · October 31, 1997 · partial · Auto-indexed

Open saved PDFOriginal source ↗
Decision date
October 31, 1997
Outcome
partial
RTA sections
25, 26(2)

Quick summary

Auto-indexed

Appeal · other. Outcome: partial.

Linked prior order: LD97-169

Order text

Order LR97-13 - A-015-97 - Rental Appeal - Sandra McMillan v. Rose Mary Gallant (Oct 31, 1997) Docket A-015-97 Order LR97-13 IN THE MATTER of an appeal, under Section 25 of the Rental of Residential Property Ac t , by Sandra McMillan (the Lessor) against Order No. LD97-169 of the Director of Residential Rental Property dated September 24, 1997. BEFORE THE COMMISSION on Friday, the 31st day of October, 1997. Wayne D. Cheverie, Q.C., Chair Anne McPhee, Commissioner Clayton Bulpitt, Commissioner Order Participants 1. Appellant: Sandra McMillan (the Lessor) 2. Respondent: Rose Mary Gallant (the Lessee) Reasons for Order 1. Background The Commission reviewed the documents in the file and entered them into evidence. There were ten Exhibits in all which were agreed to by the parties. In addition, the Lessor presented a further exhibit which was an undated estimate of the area in question to be cleaned, to which the Lessee took no exception. The facts are set out in Order LD97-169 and need not be repeated here. The Lessor testified that her only concern in the Order appealed from, had to do with the area to be cleaned as calculated by the Rental Officer. She indicated that the Rental Officer had accepted the Lessee's contention that the area in question amounted to 40% of the original agreed upon area. The Lessor then tendered a written estimate (Exhibit A-1) which fixed the disputed area to be 16.47% of the whole and not 40% as the Rental Officer had found. For her part, the Lessee took no exception to the Lessor's written estimate (Exhibit A-1) and, in fact, testified that it was the Rental Officer who came up with the 40% figure, not her. 2. Decision The issue before the Commission in this case is quite narrow. In fact, both parties now agree the compensation to the Lessor out of the security deposit based on the rental agreement should be based on 16.47% rather than 40%. In light of this, the Commission has determined that the appeal be allowed, in part, and that the Order of the Director of Residential Rental Property be varied to reflect a credit to the Lessee of $17.29 instead of $42.00. IN THE MATTER of an appeal, under Section 25 of the Rental of Residential Property Act , by Sandra McMillan (the Lessor) against Order No. LD97-169 of the Director of Residential Rental Property dated September 24, 1997. Order WHEREAS Sandra McMillan (the Appellant) appealed to the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission (the Commission), in written notice dated October 10, 1997, against a decision of the Director of Residential Rental Property; AND WHEREAS the Commission heard the appeal in Charlottetown on October 28, 1997; NOW THEREFORE , for the reasons given in the annexed Reasons for Order; IT IS ORDERED THAT 1. The appeal is allowed; 2. The Lessor shall receive a payment of $117.71; and 3. The Lessee shall receive a payment of $107.29. DATED at Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, this 31st day of October, 1997. BY THE COMMISSION: Wayne D. Cheverie, Q.C., Chair Anne McPhee, Commissioner Clayton Bulpitt, Commissioner NOTICE Sections 26.(2), 26.(3), 26.(4) and 26.(5) of the Rental of Residential Property Act provide as follows: 26.(2) A lessor or lessee may, within fifteen days of the decision of the Commission, appeal to the court on a question of law only. (3) The rules of court governing appeals apply to an appeal under subsection (2). (4) Where the Commission has confirmed, reversed or varied an order of the Director and no appeal has been taken within the time specified in subsection (2), the lessor or lessee may file the order in the court. (5) Where an order is filed pursuant to subsection (4), it may be enforced as if it were an order of the court.

Similar cases

Orders that share issues or RTA sections. Useful when comparing how similar facts were decided.

  • LD26-296granted · rto

    Tenant application · other. Outcome: granted. The Landlord must pay the Tenant $1,437.88 by the timeline below.

  • LD26-294granted · rto

    Application · other. Outcome: granted. I find that the Parking Spot is already an included service or facility in the Tenant’s rent. The Landlords must not charge the Tenant a separate fee regarding t…

  • LR26-37granted · irac

    Landlord appeal · other. Outcome: granted. The Appeal is denied and the Rental Office decision LD26-125 is confirmed. The Landlords and Bhaskar are liable to pay the Tenant a return of rent and double…

  • LR26-36dismissed · irac

    Appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The appeal is dismissed. The Commission agrees with the finding of Order LD26-130 that the parties did not have a landlord-tenant relationship, or a tenancy agreeme…

  • LR26-35dismissed · irac

    Tenant appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Appeal is denied and the Rental Office’s Order LD26-161 is upheld. The Tenant shall return the Subtenant’s security deposit in the amount of $500.00, plu…

  • LD26-238granted · rto

    Tenant application · other. Outcome: granted. The Landlord must pay the Tenant $2,256.15. This amount includes the original security deposit ($1,100.00), the $56.15 in accrued interest on the original…

  • LR26-34dismissed · irac

    Landlord appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Appeal is dismissed. Order LD26-118 is confirmed. The Landlord and Bhaskar remain jointly and severally liable to pay the Tenants a return of rent toge…

  • LR26-33dismissed · irac

    Landlord appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Appeal is dismissed. Order LD26-131 is confirmed. The Landlord and Bhaskar remain jointly and severally liable to pay the Tenant a return of rent toget…