Quick summary
Auto-indexedTenant appeal · eviction. Outcome: denied.
Linked prior order: LD14-262
Order text
Order LR14-22 - Rental Appeal - Docket LR14028 - Danielle Hunter v Director of Residential Rental Property Docket LR14028 Order LR14-22 IN THE MATTER of an appeal under Section 25 of the Rental of Residential Property Act (the Act ) filed by Danielle Hunter against Order LD14-262 of the Director of Residential Rental Property dated August 20, 2014 . BEFORE THE COMMISSION on Wednesday, the 27th day of August, 2014. John Broderick, Commissioner Michael Campbell, Commissioner Peter McCloskey, Commissioner Order BACKGROUND On August 22, 2014 the Commission received a Notice of Appeal from a lessee, Danielle Hunter (the "Appellant"), requesting an appeal of Order LD14-262 dated August 20, 2014 issued by the Director of Residential Rental Property (the "Director"). By way of background, on August 4, 2014 a lessor, Alan Ford, on behalf of himself and Shirley Ford (the "Respondents") filed with the Director a Form 2 - Application for Enforcement of Statutory or Other Conditions of Rental Agreement dated August 4, 2014 together with a Form 4 - Notice of Termination by Lessor of Rental Agreement dated July 2, 2014. The matter was heard by the Director on August 13, 2014 and in Order LD14-262 the Director ordered: "IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT 1. Possession of the residential premises be surrendered to the lessors and the Sheriff is directed to put the lessors in possession of the residential premises at 12:00 noon, Friday, August 22, 2014." The matter was heard by the Commission on August 27, 2014. The Appellant was present and Alan Ford ("Mr. Ford") represented the Respondents. EVIDENCE The Appellant testified that there were issues with the residential premises; specifically water leakage / ceiling damage to the common entryway and a lack of a second exit fire escape. She stated that there was no working fire alarm in the front of the premises. She also stated that she had fallen on hard times, was asking for more time to pay and she was not previously aware that she could not withhold rent because of deficiencies. Mr. Ford told the Commission that he first heard about the entryway ceiling issue in early August when the downstairs tenant reported it to him. Mr. Ford sent workers in to take down the false ceiling and assess the situation. Mr. Ford told the Commission that the residential premises had been gutted and remodeled prior to the Appellant moving in to the unit in March 2014. Mr. Ford characterized the Appellant's concerns as excuses for not paying rent. DECISION The Commission denies the appeal for the reasons which follow. While the Appellant's concerns may have some validity, the Rental of Residential Property Act does not permit a tenant to withhold rent. Rather, rent must continue to be paid and a tenant may make application to the Director to have the concerns investigated. In the present matter, the Appellant has fallen behind in paying rent. The Respondents' Form 2, dated August 4, 2014, identifies unpaid rent and unpaid electricity bills totalling $1280.62. Based on a review of all the evidence and the testimony heard by the Commission, the Commission agrees with both the reasoning and the result contained in Director's Order LD14-262. Accordingly, the Commission denies the appeal. NOW THEREFORE , pursuant to the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Act and the Rental of Residential Property Act ; IT IS ORDERED THAT 1. The appeal is denied. 2 . Possession of the residential premises located at 108 Upper Prince Street, Apartment A, Charlottetown, PE shall be immediately surrendered to the Respondents (lessors) and the Sheriff is directed to put the Respondents in possession of the residential premises forthwith. DATED at Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, the 27th day of August, 2014. BY THE COMMISSION : John Broderick, Commissioner Michael Campbell, Commissioner Peter McCloskey, Commissioner NOTICE Sections 26.(2), 26.(3), 26.(4) and 26.(5) of the Rental of Residential Property Act provide as follows: 26.(2) A lessor or lessee may, within fifteen days of the decision of the Commission, appeal to the court on a question of law only. (3) The rules of court governing appeals apply to an appeal under subsection (2). (4) Where the Commission has confirmed, reversed or varied an order of the Director and no appeal has been taken within the time specified in subsection (2), the lessor or lessee may file the order in the court. (5) Where an order is filed pursuant to subsection (4), it may be enforced as if it were an order of the court. NOTICE: IRAC File Retention In accordance with the Commission's Records Retention and Disposition Schedule, the material contained in the official file regarding this matter will be retained by the Commission for a period of 2 years.Similar cases
Orders that share issues or RTA sections. Useful when comparing how similar facts were decided.
- LD26-293granted · rto
Application · eviction. Outcome: granted. I find that the Notice is invalid and the Application is allowed. The tenancy will continue and the Tenant may continue living in the Unit.
- LD26-289granted · rto
Landlord application · eviction. Outcome: granted. I find that the Notice is valid and the Application is allowed. [12] The Tenants and all occupants must vacate the Unit and return the Unit’s keys to…
- LR26-38dismissed · irac
Landlord appeal · eviction, rent increase, compensation. Outcome: dismissed. The Landlord's appeal is allowed in part. The Commission substitutes a finding that the Occupation Notice is valid. The rem…
- LD26-281dismissed · rto
Application · eviction, rent arrears. Outcome: dismissed. 1. The Application is dismissed because the Rental Office does not have jurisdiction to determine the dispute between the Applicant and the Re…
- LD26-279granted · rto
Landlord application · eviction, rent arrears. Outcome: granted. The Notice is valid and the Tenants and all occupants must vacate the Unit by the timeline below.
- LD26-275granted · rto
Application · eviction, disturbance, illegal activity. Outcome: granted. I find that the Notice is invalid and the Application is allowed. The tenancy will continue and the Tenant can continue living …
- LD26-274granted · rto
Landlord application · eviction, disturbance. Outcome: granted. The Notice is valid and the Tenant and all occupants must vacate the Unit by the timeline below.
- LD26-268granted · rto
Application · eviction, disturbance, illegal activity. Outcome: granted. The tenancy will continue in full force and effect.