← Back to orders

LD24-183

RTO · June 5, 2024 · granted · Auto-indexed

Open saved PDFOriginal source ↗
Decision date
June 5, 2024
Rental officer
Andrew Cudmore
Applicant
landlord
Outcome
granted
Amount ordered
$3,725.00

Quick summary

Auto-indexed

Landlord application · other. Outcome: granted. 1. The Tenant must pay the Landlord the amount of $3,725.00 by June 30, 2024.

Linked prior order: LD24-182

Order text

Orders of the Director of Residential Tenancy
Docket 24-292 June 5, 2024
INTRODUCTION
[1] On May 9, 2024 the Landlord filed an amended Landlord Application to Determine Dispute (Form 2(B)) (the “Application”) with the Residential Tenancy Office (the “Rental Office”). The Application, included a claim for rent owing, which is the subject of this decision. The Application also seeks vacant possession of the Unit and an order for the Sheriff to put the Landlord in possession, which is the subject of Order LD24-182.
[2] On May 9, 2024 a representative of the Landlord (the “Representative”) taped a copy of the Application to the Unit’s door.
[3] The Application was supported by an Eviction Notice (Form 4(A)) served by the Landlord to the Tenant on March 28, 2024, effective April 30, 2024 (the “Notice”), for the following reasons:
You have not paid your rent in the amount of $2525.00;
You are repeatedly late in paying rent; and You have permitted an unreasonable number of occupants in the rental unit.
Particulars of termination:
Someone not on lease living there.
[4] On May 15, 2024 the Rental Office mailed the parties notice of a teleconference hearing scheduled for 11:00 a.m. on May 28, 2024, along with a copy of the Application. The Rental Office emailed the Representative a copy of these documents and requested that the Representative tape these documents to the door of the Unit.
[5] On May 21, 2024 the Representative provided the Rental Office with photographs of the documents taped to the door of the Unit.
[6] On May 23, 2024 the Rental Office emailed the Representative an evidence package and requested the Representative serve the Tenant with these documents.
[7] On May 28, 2024 the scheduled hearing was delayed from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon. The Residential Tenancy Officer (the “Officer”) was on the teleconference telephone line at the original scheduled time of 11:00 a.m. and neither party joined the conference. At 12:00 noon only the Representative joined the teleconference hearing. The Representative stated that the evidence package had not been served to the Tenant. The Officer adjourned the hearing to 9:00 a.m. on May 31, 2024.
[8] On May 28, 2024, after the scheduled hearing, the Rental Office emailed the Representative an updated evidence package (the “Evidence Package”), which included notice of a rescheduled hearing for 9:00 a.m. on May 31, 2024 (the “Notice of Hearing”). The Representative taped the
Notice of Hearing to the door of the Unit along with a copy of the Evidence Package, except for Page 1 of 20. The Representative submitted photographs to the Rental Office of the documents taped to the Unit’s door.
[9] On May 31, 2024 at 9:00 a.m. the Representative joined the teleconference hearing with the Officer.
The Tenant did not join the teleconference. The Officer telephoned two numbers for the Tenant but received no response. The Officer was satisfied that the Tenant had been provided notice of the rescheduled hearing. At 9:14 a.m. the hearing proceeded in the absence of the Tenant. The hearing concluded at 9:59 a.m. The Landlord was permitted to submit additional documents after the hearing.
ISSUE
i. Does the Tenant owe rent to the Landlord?

Orders of the Director of Residential Tenancy

SUMMARY OF THE EVIDENCE
[10] The Representative’s evidence is summarized as follows.
[11] The Unit has three bedrooms and one bathroom. The Unit is located in a duplex building (the “Residential Property”) that the Landlord has operated for thirty to forty years. The doors of the two units are on opposite ends of the Residential Property.
[12] The Landlord and the Tenant entered into a written tenancy agreement that commenced on June 1, 2019. Rent in the amount of $400.00 is due on the twentieth day of the month and a security deposit was not required.
[13] As of March 28, 2024, the date the Notice was served, the Tenant had a $2,525.00 balance of rent owing. The Representative submitted into evidence photographs of the taped Notice. The Tenant has not paid rent for April, May or June of 2024, an additional $1,200.00. The last rent payment received by the Landlord from the Tenant was $400.00 on March 1, 2024.
[14] The Notice had a typographical error regarding the Unit’s address when the Representative taped it to the Unit’s door on March 28, 2024. The Representative fixed and initialed the typographical error and taped a copy of a corrected Notice (the “Corrected Notice”) to the Unit’s door during the first week of April, approximately April 3 to 5, 2024. The Representative has been unable to locate a copy of the Corrected Notice.
[15] The Representative provided evidence regarding the occupants of the Unit.
ANALYSIS & CONCLUSION
[16] In Order LD24-182, the Officer found that the Tenant must vacate the Unit by 5:00 p.m. on June 30, 2024.
[17] The evidence establishes that the Tenant owed the Landlord $2,525.00 as of March 28, 2024 and the Tenant has not paid rent for April, May or June of 2024, in the additional amount of $1,200.00.
[18] The Officer finds that the Application is valid. The Tenant must pay the Landlord rent, in the amount of $3,725.00, by the timeline below.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT
1. The Tenant must pay the Landlord the amount of $3,725.00 by June 30, 2024.
DATED at Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, this 5th day of June, 2024.
(sgd.) Andrew Cudmore Andrew Cudmore Residential Tenancy Officer

Orders of the Director of Residential Tenancy

NOTICE
Right to Appeal
This Order can be appealed to the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission (the “Commission”) by serving a Notice of Appeal with the Commission and every party to this Order within 20 days of this Order.
If a document is sent electronically after 5:00 p.m., it is considered received the next day that is not a holiday. If a document is sent by mail, it is considered served on the third day after mailing.
Filing with the Court
If no appeal has been made within the noted timelines, this Order can be filed with the Supreme Court of Prince Edward Island and enforced as if it were an order of the Court.

Similar cases

Orders that share issues or RTA sections. Useful when comparing how similar facts were decided.

  • LD26-296granted · rto

    Tenant application · other. Outcome: granted. The Landlord must pay the Tenant $1,437.88 by the timeline below.

  • LD26-294granted · rto

    Application · other. Outcome: granted. I find that the Parking Spot is already an included service or facility in the Tenant’s rent. The Landlords must not charge the Tenant a separate fee regarding t…

  • LR26-37granted · irac

    Landlord appeal · other. Outcome: granted. The Appeal is denied and the Rental Office decision LD26-125 is confirmed. The Landlords and Bhaskar are liable to pay the Tenant a return of rent and double…

  • LR26-36dismissed · irac

    Appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The appeal is dismissed. The Commission agrees with the finding of Order LD26-130 that the parties did not have a landlord-tenant relationship, or a tenancy agreeme…

  • LR26-35dismissed · irac

    Tenant appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Appeal is denied and the Rental Office’s Order LD26-161 is upheld. The Tenant shall return the Subtenant’s security deposit in the amount of $500.00, plu…

  • LD26-238granted · rto

    Tenant application · other. Outcome: granted. The Landlord must pay the Tenant $2,256.15. This amount includes the original security deposit ($1,100.00), the $56.15 in accrued interest on the original…

  • LR26-34dismissed · irac

    Landlord appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Appeal is dismissed. Order LD26-118 is confirmed. The Landlord and Bhaskar remain jointly and severally liable to pay the Tenants a return of rent toge…

  • LR26-33dismissed · irac

    Landlord appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Appeal is dismissed. Order LD26-131 is confirmed. The Landlord and Bhaskar remain jointly and severally liable to pay the Tenant a return of rent toget…