← Back to orders

LR22-56

IRAC · September 23, 2022 · dismissed · Auto-indexed

Open saved PDFOriginal source ↗
Decision date
September 23, 2022
Panel / officer
M. Douglas Clow
Applicant
landlord
Outcome
dismissed
Issues
abandonment
RTA sections
25, 26(2)

Quick summary

Auto-indexed

Landlord appeal · abandonment. Outcome: dismissed. Mr. Ross failed to appear at his own appeal. The appeal is deemed abandoned and is therefore dismissed. NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Act and the Rental of Residential Property Act;

Linked prior order: LD22-275

Order text

LR22056 – Ian Ross v. Lindsay Oehlke Friday, September 23, 2022 Docket: LR22056
Order: LR22-56
BEFORE THE COMMISSION ON Friday, September 23, 2022.
Panel Chair - Erin T. Mitchell, Commissioner
M. Douglas Clow, Vice-Chair
Hearing Date: Friday, September 23, 2022
ORDER
IN THE MATTER of an appeal, under section 25 of the Rental of Residential Property Act (the “Act”), filed by Ian Ross against Order LD22-275
issued by the Director of Residential Rental
Property and dated August 8, 2022.
Compared and Certified a True Copy
(Sgd.) Susan Jefferson Commission Administrator Corporate Services and Appeals

Orders of The Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Order LR22-56 – Page 2 Docket LR22056 – Ian Ross v. Lindsay Oehlke Friday, September 23, 2022 This appeal asks the Commission to determine whether the Director of Residential Rental Property (the “Director”) erred in determining the disbursement of a security deposit.
Background
Ian Ross (“Mr. Ross”) rented a room located at 284 Sydney Street, Charlottetown PE (the “Premises”), from Lindsay Oehlke (“Ms. Oehlke”) commencing December 15, 2019. Rent for the Premises was $675 per month and was due and payable on the first day of the month. A security deposit in the amount of $675 was required and paid.
The Tenant vacated the Premises on June 30, 2022.
On July 15, 2022, Mr. Ross filed with the Director an Application re Determination of the Security Deposit (“Form 9”), together with a copy of a security deposit notice received from Ms. Oehlke seeking to retain the security deposit, plus interest.
On August 2, 2022 the Form 9 application was heard by the Director. In Order LD22-275
dated August 8, 2022, the Director denied the application and awarded the security deposit, plus interest, in the amount of $683.75 to Ms. Oehlke.
Mr. Ross appealed.
The Commission heard the appeal on September 23, 2022. Ms. Oehlke participated by way of telephone conference call. Mr. Ross did not participate.
The Commission noted on the record that Mr. Ross was advised of the date, time and method of participation by email on September 9, 2022 and again by email on September 22, 2022.
At the start of the hearing, Commission staff left a telephone voicemail message advising Mr.
Ross that the appeal had started and that it would be abandoned if he did not call in to the hearing within the next five minutes.
Disposition
Mr. Ross failed to appear at his own appeal. The appeal is deemed abandoned and is therefore dismissed.
NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Act and the Rental of Residential Property Act;
IT IS ORDERED THAT
1. The appeal is dismissed and Director’s Order LD22-275 remains in full force and effect.
DATED at Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, the 23rd day of September, 2022.
BY THE COMMISSION:
(sgd. Erin T. Mitchell)

Panel Chair - Erin T. Mitchell, Commissioner
(sgd. M. Douglas Clow)

M. Douglas Clow, Vice-Chair

Orders of The Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Order LR22-56 – Page 3 Docket LR22056 – Ian Ross v. Lindsay Oehlke Friday, September 23, 2022
NOTICE
Subsections 26(2), 26(3), 26(4) and 26(5) of the Rental of Residential Property Act provides as follows:
26. (2) A lessor or lessee may, within fifteen days of the
decision of the Commission, appeal to the court on a question of law only.
(3) The rules of court governing appeals apply to an appeal under subsection (2).
(4) Where the Commission has confirmed, reversed, or varied an order of the Director and no appeal has been taken within the time specified in subsection (2), the lessor or lessee may file the order in the court.
(5) Where an order is filed pursuant to subsection (4), it may be enforced as if it were an order of the court.

Similar cases

Orders that share issues or RTA sections. Useful when comparing how similar facts were decided.

  • LD26-286granted · rto

    Landlord application · abandonment. Outcome: granted. I find that the Landlords may dispose of the Personal Property listen on the Inventory on or after August 14, 2026.

  • LD26-271granted · rto

    Landlord application · abandonment. Outcome: granted. I find that the Landlord may dispose of the Personal Property on or after July 31, 2026.

  • LD26-264denied · rto

    Application · compensation, abandonment. Outcome: denied. 1. The Application is denied.

  • LD26-242granted · rto

    Landlord application · abandonment. Outcome: granted. The Landlord may dispose of the Personal Property in the Inventory List on the terms provided below.

  • LD26-215granted · rto

    Application · security deposit, abandonment. Outcome: granted. I find that the tenancy will continue and the Tenant can continue living in the Unit. [4] The Landlord is prohibited from removing person…

  • LR26-30dismissed · irac

    Tenant appeal · abandonment. Outcome: dismissed. The appeal is deemed abandoned in accordance with Rule 29(1)(d) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure.

  • LR26-28dismissed · irac

    Tenant appeal · security deposit, rent arrears, abandonment. Outcome: dismissed.

  • LR26-25dismissed · irac

    Tenant appeal · abandonment. Outcome: dismissed. The appeal is deemed abandoned in accordance with Rule 29(1)(d) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure.