Quick summary
Auto-indexedAppeal · eviction. Outcome: denied. The appeal is denied. The Issue The Commission must decide whether the Director’s decision to terminate the rental agreement due to persistent and habitual late payment of rent is justified.
Linked prior order: LD21-297
Order text
Docket LR21032 – Kayla MacDonald v. Melissa Graham Burke August 26, 2021 Compared and Certified a True Copy (Sgd.) Susan Jefferson Commission Administrator Corporate Services and Appeals Docket: LR21032 Order: LR21-31 BEFORE THE COMMISSION ON Thursday, August 26, 2021. Panel Chair - Erin T. Mitchell, Commissioner M. Douglas Clow, Vice-Chair Hearing Date: Tuesday, August 24, 2021 ORDER IN THE MATTER of an appeal, under section 25 of the Rental of Residential Property Act (the “Act”), filed by Kayla MacDonald against Order LD21-297, issued by the Director of Residential Rental Property and dated August 9, 2021. Orders of The Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Order LR21-31 – Page 2 Docket LR21032 – Kayla MacDonald v. Melissa Graham Burke August 26, 2021 This appeal asks the question of whether the Director erred in terminating a rental agreement due to the persistent and habitual late payment of rent by a tenant. BACKGROUND Kayla MacDonald (“Ms. MacDonald”) rents a single-family dwelling located at 13 Francis Street, Kensington, PE (the “Premises”), from Melissa Graham Burke (“Ms. Graham Burke”). Rent for the Premises is $1,400 per month with rent due on the first day of the month. On July 27, 2021, Ms. Graham Burke filed with the Director of Residential Rental Property (the “Director”) an application requesting an Order terminating the rental agreement because Ms. MacDonald is persistently and habitually late paying rent (the “Application”). Included in the Application were a series of Notices of Termination (“Form 4s”) directed to Ms. McDonald and signed by Ms. Graham Burke. Ms. MacDonald challenged the Application. In Order LD21-297 dated August 9, 2021, the Director ordered that Ms. MacDonald, and all occupants, must vacate the Premises by 2:00 p.m. on August 13, 2021. Ms. MacDonald appealed tthe Commission on August 10, 2021. The Commission scheduled the appeal to be heard on August 18, 2021. Ms. MacDonald requested a postponement of the appeal hearing. The appeal was heard on August 24, 2021. Ms. MacDonald and Ms. Graham Burke participated by way of telephone conference call. Disposition The appeal is denied. The Issue The Commission must decide whether the Director’s decision to terminate the rental agreement due to persistent and habitual late payment of rent is justified. Analysis The evidence before the Commission establishes that six consecutive Form 4 termination notices were served on Ms. MacDonald for the months of February 2021 through July 2021 inclusive. While the evidence establishes that rent for the months of February 2021 to June 2021 was ultimately paid, albeit late, Ms. Graham Burke also contends that the rent for July 2021 was never paid and she has provided bank records to establish that a rent payment was not received in July 2021. Orders of The Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Order LR21-31 – Page 3 Docket LR21032 – Kayla MacDonald v. Melissa Graham Burke August 26, 2021 Ms. MacDonald contends that she did pay the July 2021 rent on July 10, 2021. Both parties acknowledge that no rent has yet been paid for the month of August 2021. In Director’s Order LD21-297, Ms. MacDonald was given the opportunity to file banking documents to establish her contention that she did pay rent in July 2021. No such documents were received by the Director, and no such documents were received by the Commission on appeal. The Commission agrees with the Director’s ruling that there was a persistent and habitual late payment of rent and that the rental agreement should therefore be terminated. The Commission finds that there is no new evidence to warrant disturbing the findings and ruling of the Director. Accordingly, the appeal is denied. NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Act and the Rental of Residential Property Act; IT IS ORDERED THAT 1. The appeal is denied. 2. Director’s Order LD21-297 is confirmed. DATED at Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Thursday, August 26, 2021. BY THE COMMISSION: (sgd. Erin T. Mitchell) Panel Chair - Erin T. Mitchell, Commissioner (sgd. M. Douglas Clow) M. Douglas Clow, Vice-Chair Orders of The Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Order LR21-31 – Page 4 Docket LR21032 – Kayla MacDonald v. Melissa Graham Burke August 26, 2021 NOTICE Subsections 26(2), 26(3), 26(4) and 26(5) of the Rental of Residential Property Act provides as follows: 26. (2) A lessor or lessee may, within fifteen days of the decision of the Commission, appeal to the court on a question of law only. (3) The rules of court governing appeals apply to an appeal under subsection (2). (4) Where the Commission has confirmed, reversed, or varied an order of the Director and no appeal has been taken within the time specified in subsection (2), the lessor or lessee may file the order in the court. (5) Where an order is filed pursuant to subsection (4), it may be enforced as if it were an order of the court.
Similar cases
Orders that share issues or RTA sections. Useful when comparing how similar facts were decided.
- LD26-293granted · rto
Application · eviction. Outcome: granted. I find that the Notice is invalid and the Application is allowed. The tenancy will continue and the Tenant may continue living in the Unit.
- LD26-289granted · rto
Landlord application · eviction. Outcome: granted. I find that the Notice is valid and the Application is allowed. [12] The Tenants and all occupants must vacate the Unit and return the Unit’s keys to…
- LR26-38dismissed · irac
Landlord appeal · eviction, rent increase, compensation. Outcome: dismissed. The Landlord's appeal is allowed in part. The Commission substitutes a finding that the Occupation Notice is valid. The rem…
- LD26-281dismissed · rto
Application · eviction, rent arrears. Outcome: dismissed. 1. The Application is dismissed because the Rental Office does not have jurisdiction to determine the dispute between the Applicant and the Re…
- LD26-279granted · rto
Landlord application · eviction, rent arrears. Outcome: granted. The Notice is valid and the Tenants and all occupants must vacate the Unit by the timeline below.
- LD26-275granted · rto
Application · eviction, disturbance, illegal activity. Outcome: granted. I find that the Notice is invalid and the Application is allowed. The tenancy will continue and the Tenant can continue living …
- LD26-274granted · rto
Landlord application · eviction, disturbance. Outcome: granted. The Notice is valid and the Tenant and all occupants must vacate the Unit by the timeline below.
- LD26-268granted · rto
Application · eviction, disturbance, illegal activity. Outcome: granted. The tenancy will continue in full force and effect.