← Back to orders

LD24-433

RTO · December 20, 2024 · granted · Auto-indexed

Open saved PDFOriginal source ↗
Decision date
December 20, 2024
Rental officer
Mitchell King
Applicant
landlord
Outcome
granted
Issues
rent increase
RTA sections
50(3), 50(4), 75(3)

Quick summary

Auto-indexed

Landlord application · rent increase. Outcome: granted. I find that the evidence supports 5.3% rent increases.

Linked prior order: LR24-27

Order text

Orders of the Director of Residential Tenancy
Docket 24-632 December 20, 2024
INTRODUCTION
[1] The Landlord seeks 5.3% rent increases for the Units, being an additional 3.0% above the 2025 annual allowable guideline of 2.3%.
DISPOSITION
[2] I find that the evidence supports 5.3% rent increases.
BACKGROUND
[2] The Units are located in a five-unit building (the “Residential Property”) that the Landlord purchased in 1974.
[3] On September 27, 2024, the Landlord served all the Tenants with Form 9 Landlord Applications to Request Additional Rent Increases (the “Applications”) and filed the Applications with the Residential Tenancy Office (the “Rental Office”).
[4] The Applications show the current rents, the proposed rents, the date of the last rent increases, and the proposed effective dates for the rent increases as follows:
Unit Current Rent Proposed Rent (5.3%) Date of Last Rent Increase Proposed Effective Date 133 $762.00 $802.00 January 1, 2024 January 1, 2025 1-135 $815.00 $858.00 January 1, 2024 January 1, 2025 2-135 $770.00 $811.00 January 1, 2024 January 1, 2025 3-135 $895.00 $942.00 January 1, 2024 January 1, 2025 137 $855.00 $900.00 January 1, 2024 January 1, 2025
[5] On October 24, 2024, the Rental Office mailed and emailed the parties notice of a teleconference hearing scheduled for December 3, 2024.
[6] On November 28, 2024, the Rental Office emailed an evidence package to the Landlord to serve to the Tenants. The Landlord confirmed serving the evidence packages.
[7] A teleconference hearing was held on December 3, 2024, and a Landlord representative (the “Representative”) participated who confirmed receiving the evidence package and that all submitted documents were included.
ISSUE
A. Does the evidence support 5.3% rent increases for the Units?
ANALYSIS
Adjustments to the Statement
[8] The adjustments to the Statement are provided below and are reflected in Appendix “A.”

Orders of the Director of Residential Tenancy

[Line 1 – Rental Income]
[9] The Landlord provided the 2024 rental income up to September 2024. The documentary evidence establishes the 2024 rental income will be $50,244.00. Line 1 is adjusted.
[Line 12 – Management Fee]
[10] The Statement discloses $9,344.76 for management fees for 2023. Clause 1(c) of the Residential Tenancy Regulations (the “Regulations”) limits management fees to the “actual cost of the management fee or 5 percent of the gross rental income for the previous year, whichever is the lesser.” In this case, 5.0% of the 2023 gross rental income was $2,458.20, and 5.0% of the 2024 rental income will be $2,588.48. Line 12 is adjusted.
[Line 15 – Other]
[11] The Landlord did not add the waste watch fee to the Statement. Line 15 is adjusted to $1,065.00.
[Value of the Investment in the Property]
[12] The Landlord purchased the Residential Property in 1974 for $31,541.60, and there is no mortgage.
The tax-assessed value of the Residential Property is $166,000.00. I find the tax-assessed value more accurate than the purchase price when determining the property’s current value and will use this as the property’s value.
[13] The Landlord has appraisals for the Units but does not want them to be a part of the evidence shared with other parties.
Reviewing the Factors
[14] To determine the Applications, I must consider and weigh the following factors in subsection 50(3) of the Residential Tenancy Act (the “Act”):
a. The rent history for the affected Units in the three years preceding the date of the Applications.
i. The Landlord provided the rent history for the past three years. The rent for the Units was last increased on January 1, 2024.
b. A change in operating expenses and capital expenditures in the three years preceding the date of the Applications that the Director considers relevant and reasonable.
i. The Landlord submitted documents as evidence to assist in disclosing a change in the operating expenses over the past three years. In the three years that have been disclosed, the operating expenses for the Units, such as insurance and municipal property taxes, have increased. No capital expenditures were incurred for the Units.
c. The expectation of the Landlord to have a reasonable return on the Landlord’s capital investment.
i. After adjusting the Statement’s income and expenses, as shown in Appendix “A,” the Landlord is currently making a return on investment of 5.6%. With the inclusion of the requested additional rent increase, the Landlord would be making a return on investment of 6.4%.
d. The expectation of the Tenants that rent increases will remain within the annual guidelines.

Orders of the Director of Residential Tenancy

i. No Tenants disputed the proposed rent increases.
[15] Subsection 50(4) provides that I have the discretion to consider any other relevant factor and any factor prescribed in the Regulations. The only other factor stated in the Regulations is that the purchase of a residential property should not require an increase in rent within the first year to achieve a reasonable return on the landlord’s capital investment. This factor is irrelevant because the Landlord has owned the Units since 1974.
Weighing the Factors
[16] I find the totality of the factors weighs in favour of additional rent increases for the Units. In coming to this conclusion, I note in particular:
a. In Order LR24-27, the Island Regulatory and Appeal Commission (the “Commission”) commented that a reasonable return on investment of 7.0% is appropriate when a landlord relies on the tax-assessed value of a property.
b. The Landlord is currently making a return on their investment of 5.6%. With the requested additional rent increase, the Landlord’s return on investment would be 6.4%.
c. Some expenses, such as insurance and municipal property taxes, have increased.
[17] After considering and weighing all the factors and evidence, I find that the factors support 5.3% rent increases for the Units, effective January 1, 2025. The Applications are allowed.
[18] This decision contains sensitive information, and the parties must preserve its confidentiality under subsection 75(3) of the Act.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT
1. Effective January 1, 2025, the rents for the Units are as follows:
Unit Rent 133 $802.00 1-135 $858.00 2-135 $811.00 3-135 $942.00 137 $900.00
DATED at Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, this 20th day of December, 2024.
______________________________(sgd.) Mitchell King __________ Mitchell King Residential Tenancy Officer

Orders of the Director of Residential Tenancy

APPENDIX “A” Revised Statement of Income & Expenses (Form 10) Current Allowed (5.3%) Income Rental Income at 100% (Line 1) $50,244.00 $51,756.00 Vacancy Arrears/Losses (Line 2) $0.00 $0.00 Net Income before expenses (Line 3) $50,244.00 $51,756.00 Expenses 1st Mortgage Interest (Line 4) $0.00 $0.00 2nd Mortgage Interest (Line 5) $0.00 $0.00 Fuel (Line 6) $11,847.30 $11,847.30 Water & Sewer (Line 7) $1,632.74 $1,632.74 Electricity (Line 8) $628.76 $628.76 Insurance (Line 9) $3,629.00 $3,629.00 Property Tax (Provincial) (Line 10) $1,510.46 $1,510.46 Property Tax (Municipal) (Line 11) $1,510.60 $1,510.60 Management Fee (Line 12) $2,458.20 $2,588.48 Maintenance Fee (Line 13) $16,705.99 $16,705.99 Capital Expenditures (Line 14) $0.00 $0.00 Other (Line 15) $1,065.00 $1,065.00 Total Operating Expenses (Line 16) $40,988.05 $41,118.33 Net Profit or (Loss) (Line 17) $9,255.95 $10,637.67 Value of Investment in Property $166,000.00 $166,000.00 Operating Income (Line 17) $9,255.95 $10,637.67 Return on Investment (ROI) 5.6% 6.4%
NOTICE
Right to Appeal
This Order can be appealed to the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission (the “Commission”) by serving a Notice of Appeal with the Commission and every party to this Order within 20 days of this Order.
If a document is sent electronically after 5:00 p.m., it is considered received the next day that is not a holiday. If a document is sent by mail, it is considered served on the third day after mailing.
Filing with the Court
If no appeal has been made within the noted timelines, this Order can be filed with the Supreme Court of Prince Edward Island and enforced as if it were an order of the Court.

Similar cases

Orders that share issues or RTA sections. Useful when comparing how similar facts were decided.

  • LR26-38dismissed · irac

    Landlord appeal · eviction, rent increase, compensation. Outcome: dismissed. The Landlord's appeal is allowed in part. The Commission substitutes a finding that the Occupation Notice is valid. The rem…

  • LD26-276partial · rto

    Tenant application · rent increase, compensation, repairs. Outcome: partial. 1. The Landlords must pay the Tenants $401.99 by September 5, 2026. 2. The Former Landlord 2 must pay the Tenants $90.00 by…

  • LD26-267granted · rto

    Landlord application · rent increase. Outcome: granted. The Application is allowed.

  • LD26-258granted · rto

    Landlord application · rent increase. Outcome: granted. I find that Applications are allowed.

  • LD26-244granted · rto

    Landlord application · rent increase. Outcome: granted. I find that the Units’ rents will increase by 5.0% effective June 1, 2026. The rents will increase by the 2027 annual allowable percentage plus …

  • LD26-233granted · rto

    Application · eviction, rent increase, compensation. Outcome: granted.

  • LD26-211unknown · rto

    Landlord application · rent increase. Outcome: outcome pending review. I find that the Units’ rents will increase by 5.0% effective July 1, 2026, except for units 10, 14 and 15 (the “Three Units”), wh…

  • LD26-203granted · rto

    Landlord application · rent increase. Outcome: granted. The Landlord’s evidence supports a 5.0% rent increase for the Unit effective June 1, 2026.