← Back to orders

LR23-13

IRAC · April 26, 2023 · dismissed · Auto-indexed

Open saved PDFOriginal source ↗
Decision date
April 26, 2023
Panel / officer
M. Douglas Clow
Outcome
dismissed
RTA sections
25, 15(1)(a), 26(2)

Quick summary

Auto-indexed

Appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The appeal is dismissed.

Linked prior order: LD23-105

Order text

Docket LR23021 – Ashley Bridges v Bruce Palmer Wednesday, April 26, 2023 Docket: LR23021
Order: LR23-13
BEFORE THE COMMISSION ON Wednesday, April 26, 2023.
Panel Chair - Erin T. Mitchell, Commissioner
M. Douglas Clow, Vice-Chair
Hearing Date: Tuesday, April 25, 2023
ORDER
IN THE MATTER of an appeal, under section 25 of the Rental of Residential Property Act (the “Act”), filed by Ashley Bridges, against Order LD23-105 issued by the Director of Residential Rental Property, dated March 21, 2023.
Compared and Certified a True Copy
(Sgd.) Susan Jefferson Commission Administrator Corporate Services and Appeals

Orders of The Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Order LR23-13 - Page 2 Docket LR23021 – Ashley Bridges v. Bruce Palmer Wednesday, April 26, 2023 This appeal asks the Commission to determine whether the Director of Residential Rental Property (the “Director”) erred in finding that an eviction notice was valid.
BACKGROUND
Ashley Bridges (“Ms. Bridges”) rents 489 North Market Street, Summerside, PE (the “Premises”), from Bruce Palmer (the “Landlord””).
On January 6, 2023 Ms. Bridges was served with a Notice of Termination by Lessor of Rental Agreement for pursuant to subsection 15(1)(a) of the Act (the “Form 4”). The effective date of the Form 4 was March 6, 2023.
On March 6, 2023, the Landlord filed an application seeking an order that possession of the Premises be surrendered to the Lessor and directing the Sheriff to put the Landlord in possession (the “Application”).
In Order LD23-105 dated March 21, 2023, the Director found that the Application was valid and ordered that the rental agreement be terminated effective May 31, 2023 at 11:59 p.m.
and a certified of the Order could be filed with the Supreme Court and enforced by Sheriff Services as permitting by the Act.
Ms. Bridges appealed the Order.
The Commission heard the appeal by way of telephone conference call on April 25, 2023.
Ms. Bridges did not appear. Krystal MacKenzie appeared on behalf of the Landlord.
Disposition
The appeal is dismissed.
Analysis
Commission staff advised Ms. Bridges of the date, time and method of participation by emails dated April 13 and April 24, 2023. At the start of the hearing at 1:30 p.m. April 25, 2023, Ms. Bridges’ absence was noted and Commission staff attempted to call Ms.
Bridges (the call went to voicemail) and sent a further email. The hearing then commenced at 1:40 p.m. and concluded at 1:44 p.m.
The Commission is satisfied that Ms. Bridges was made aware of the date, time and method of participation. As Ms. Bridges failed to participate in her appeal hearing, the Commission deems her appeal abandoned.
NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Act and the Rental of Residential Property Act;
IT IS ORDERED THAT
1. The appeal is dismissed.
2. Director’s Order LD23-105 is confirmed.

Orders of The Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Order LR23-13 - Page 3 Docket LR23021 – Ashley Bridges v. Bruce Palmer Wednesday, April 26, 2023
DATED at Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, this 26th day of April, 2023.
BY THE COMMISSION:
(sgd. Erin T. Mitchell)

Panel Chair - Erin T. Mitchell, Commissioner
(sgd. M. Douglas Clow)

M. Douglas Clow, Vice-Chair
NOTICE
Subsections 26(2), 26(3), 26(4) and 26(5) of the Rental of Residential Property Act provides as follows:
26. (2) A lessor or lessee may, within fifteen days of the
decision of the Commission, appeal to the court on a question of law only.
(3) The rules of court governing appeals apply to an appeal under subsection (2).
(4) Where the Commission has confirmed, reversed, or varied an order of the Director and no appeal has been taken within the time specified in subsection (2), the lessor or lessee may file the order in the court.
(5) Where an order is filed pursuant to subsection (4), it may be enforced as if it were an order of the court.

Similar cases

Orders that share issues or RTA sections. Useful when comparing how similar facts were decided.

  • LD26-296granted · rto

    Tenant application · other. Outcome: granted. The Landlord must pay the Tenant $1,437.88 by the timeline below.

  • LD26-294granted · rto

    Application · other. Outcome: granted. I find that the Parking Spot is already an included service or facility in the Tenant’s rent. The Landlords must not charge the Tenant a separate fee regarding t…

  • LR26-37granted · irac

    Landlord appeal · other. Outcome: granted. The Appeal is denied and the Rental Office decision LD26-125 is confirmed. The Landlords and Bhaskar are liable to pay the Tenant a return of rent and double…

  • LR26-36dismissed · irac

    Appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The appeal is dismissed. The Commission agrees with the finding of Order LD26-130 that the parties did not have a landlord-tenant relationship, or a tenancy agreeme…

  • LR26-35dismissed · irac

    Tenant appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Appeal is denied and the Rental Office’s Order LD26-161 is upheld. The Tenant shall return the Subtenant’s security deposit in the amount of $500.00, plu…

  • LD26-238granted · rto

    Tenant application · other. Outcome: granted. The Landlord must pay the Tenant $2,256.15. This amount includes the original security deposit ($1,100.00), the $56.15 in accrued interest on the original…

  • LR26-34dismissed · irac

    Landlord appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Appeal is dismissed. Order LD26-118 is confirmed. The Landlord and Bhaskar remain jointly and severally liable to pay the Tenants a return of rent toge…

  • LR26-33dismissed · irac

    Landlord appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Appeal is dismissed. Order LD26-131 is confirmed. The Landlord and Bhaskar remain jointly and severally liable to pay the Tenant a return of rent toget…