← Back to orders

LR12-08

IRAC · March 8, 2012 · denied · Auto-indexed

Open saved PDFOriginal source ↗
Decision date
March 8, 2012
Outcome
denied
RTA sections
25, 10(5), 2, 10(12), 10, 3, 26(2)

Quick summary

Auto-indexed

Appeal · other. Outcome: denied.

Linked prior order: LD12-017

Order text

Order LR12-08 - Rental Appeal - Docket LR12002 -Trent Cousins v Director of Residential Rental Property Docket LR12002 Order LR12-08 IN THE MATTER of an appeal, under Section 25 of the Rental of Residential Property Act , by Trent Cousins against Order LD12-017 issued by the Director of Residential Rental Property dated January 17, 2012. BEFORE THE COMMISSION on Thursday, the 8th day of March, 2012. John Broderick, Commissioner Peter McCloskey, Commissioner Jean Tingley, Commissioner Order BACKGROUND On January 25, 2012 the Commission received a Notice of Appeal dated January 18, 2012 from Trent Cousins (the Appellant) requesting an appeal of Order LD12-017 dated January 17, 2012 said Order issued by the Director of Residential Rental Property (the Director). By way of background, on August 15, 2011 Lisa Livingston (the Respondent) filed with the Director a Form 2 - Application for Enforcement of Statutory or Other Conditions of Rental Agreement. The matter was heard by the Director on November 18, 2011. Order LD12-017 states, in part: " IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT The lessor shall pay to the lessee an amount of $353.66 on or before January 31, 2012." The Commission heard this appeal on February 13, 2012. The Appellant was present at the hearing along with Pete Doucette, who testified on behalf of the Appellant. The Respondent participated in the hearing via speakerphone along with Richard Arsenault, who testified on the Respondent's behalf via speakerphone. EVIDENCE The Appellant testified that he took ownership of the rental property in question on September 30, 2011. He had been credited with two security deposits for tenants other than the Respondent. He filed a copy of the statement of adjustments as Exhibit E-9. He stated that he did not own the property when the lease ended. He also stated that he first learned of the situation when he received a copy of Director's Order LD12-017. Mr. Doucette testified that he was the property manager under the former owner and he remains the property manager under the Appellant. Mr. Doucette testified that he was not the property manager when the Respondent first moved into the apartment. The former owner held the Respondent's security deposit. Mr. Doucette testified that he didn't know why he did not answer the Respondent's email inquiry. The Respondent testified that when she moved into the apartment it was in "rough shape". She stated that she left it in better condition than when she moved in. Mr. Arsenault testified that he helped the Respondent move in to the apartment and helped her to clean it as well. Three exhibits were filed at the hearing before the Commission: Exhibit E-9 Statement of Adjustments Exhibit E-10 Absolute Bill of Sale Exhibit E-11 Property Management Agreement Apparently, the Director did not have these documents when she issued Order LD12-017. The Commission denies this appeal and confirms the Director's Order LD12-017 for the reasons that follow. Subsection 10.(5) of the Rental of Residential Property Act (the Act t) reads as follows: 10.(5) The lessor may retain all or part of a security deposit and interest thereon where he believes the lessee is liable to the lessor for damage to the residential premises caused by a breach of statutory condition 4, or for outstanding rent, provided that the lessor, within ten days of the date on which the lessee delivers up possession of the residential premises or such longer period as the Director may permit, serves the lessee with a notice of intention to retain security deposit in the form prescribed by regulation. 1998,c.100,s.2. Subsection 10.(12) of the Act reads as follows: 10.(12) A person who acquires the interest of a lessor in residential premises, whether by purchase, mortgage sale or otherwise, has the rights and is subject to the obligations of the previous lessor with respect to a security deposit paid to the previous lessor. 1988,c.58,s.10; 1990,c.53,s.3; 1998,c.100,s.2. In the present matter, the Respondent gave up possession of the apartment on July 31, 2011. On August 15, 2011, the Respondent filed a Form 2 with the Director seeking a return of the security deposit. On August 18, 2011, the Director sent a letter concerning the security deposit to Mr. Doucette, who at that time served as the representative for the former owner of the residential premises. A second letter (undated) was sent from the Director to Mr. Doucette (apparently mailed on October 19, 2011). Exhibit E-11 reveals that Mr. Doucette's firm, East Coast Property Management, was retained as the Appellant's "agent" to "rent, lease, operate and manage" effective October 17, 2011. The record reveals that Mr. Doucette did not reply to either letter. The Commission finds that both the previous owner and the Appellant were, through their property manager, given a reasonable period of time to serve the Respondent with a Form 8 Notice of Intention to Retain Security Deposit; however no such document was served. Accordingly, both the former owner and the Appellant failed to comply with the requirements of subsection 10(5) of the Act . The Commission finds that the Appellant was left unaware of the security deposit situation by both the previous owner and Mr. Doucette. The Commission is sympathetic to the situation that the Appellant has found himself in. However, subsection 10.(12) of the Act passes both the rights and the obligations, with respect to a security deposit, from the previous owner to the new owner. The obligation to return the Respondent's security deposit now rests on the Appellant. For these reasons, the Commission hereby confirms Director's Order LD12-017 in its entirety and the Commission orders that the Appellant pay the Respondent the sum of $353.66 forthwith (immediately, without delay). NOW THEREFORE , pursuant to the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Act and the Rental of Residential Property Act ; IT IS ORDERED THAT 1. The appeal is denied. 2. Director's Order LD12-017 is hereby confirmed in its entirety. 3. The Appellant Trent Cousins shall pay the Respondent Lisa Livingston the sum of $353.66 forthwith. DATED at Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, the 8th day of March, 2012. BY THE COMMISSION : John Broderick, Commissioner Peter McCloskey, Commissioner Jean Tingley, Commissioner NOTICE Sections 26.(2), 26.(3), 26.(4) and 26.(5) of the Rental of Residential Property Act provide as follows: 26.(2) A lessor or lessee may, within fifteen days of the decision of the Commission, appeal to the court on a question of law only. (3) The rules of court governing appeals apply to an appeal under subsection (2). (4) Where the Commission has confirmed, reversed or varied an order of the Director and no appeal has been taken within the time specified in subsection (2), the lessor or lessee may file the order in the court. (5) Where an order is filed pursuant to subsection (4), it may be enforced as if it were an order of the court. NOTICE: IRAC File Retention In accordance with the Commission's Records Retention and Disposition Schedule, the material contained in the official file regarding this matter will be retained by the Commission for a period of 2 years.

Similar cases

Orders that share issues or RTA sections. Useful when comparing how similar facts were decided.

  • LD26-296granted · rto

    Tenant application · other. Outcome: granted. The Landlord must pay the Tenant $1,437.88 by the timeline below.

  • LD26-294granted · rto

    Application · other. Outcome: granted. I find that the Parking Spot is already an included service or facility in the Tenant’s rent. The Landlords must not charge the Tenant a separate fee regarding t…

  • LR26-37granted · irac

    Landlord appeal · other. Outcome: granted. The Appeal is denied and the Rental Office decision LD26-125 is confirmed. The Landlords and Bhaskar are liable to pay the Tenant a return of rent and double…

  • LR26-36dismissed · irac

    Appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The appeal is dismissed. The Commission agrees with the finding of Order LD26-130 that the parties did not have a landlord-tenant relationship, or a tenancy agreeme…

  • LR26-35dismissed · irac

    Tenant appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Appeal is denied and the Rental Office’s Order LD26-161 is upheld. The Tenant shall return the Subtenant’s security deposit in the amount of $500.00, plu…

  • LD26-238granted · rto

    Tenant application · other. Outcome: granted. The Landlord must pay the Tenant $2,256.15. This amount includes the original security deposit ($1,100.00), the $56.15 in accrued interest on the original…

  • LR26-34dismissed · irac

    Landlord appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Appeal is dismissed. Order LD26-118 is confirmed. The Landlord and Bhaskar remain jointly and severally liable to pay the Tenants a return of rent toge…

  • LR26-33dismissed · irac

    Landlord appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Appeal is dismissed. Order LD26-131 is confirmed. The Landlord and Bhaskar remain jointly and severally liable to pay the Tenant a return of rent toget…