← Back to orders

LR22-23

IRAC · May 9, 2022 · dismissed · Auto-indexed

Open saved PDFOriginal source ↗
Decision date
May 9, 2022
Panel / officer
M. Douglas Clow
Outcome
dismissed
Issues
eviction, abandonment
RTA sections
25, 26(2)

Quick summary

Auto-indexed

Appeal · eviction, abandonment. Outcome: dismissed. The appeal is deemed abandoned and therefore dismissed. The Issue Did the Director correctly determine that the Form 4 was valid?

Linked prior order: LD22-107

Order text

Docket LR22032 – Steven MacPherson v. Doris MacLeod Monday, May 9, 2022 Docket: LR22032
Order: LR22-23
BEFORE THE COMMISSION ON Monday, May 9, 2022.
Panel Chair - Erin T. Mitchell, Commissioner
M. Douglas Clow, Vice-Chair
Hearing Date: Monday, May 9, 2022
ORDER
IN THE MATTER of an appeal, under section 25 of the Rental of Residential Property Act (the “Act”), filed by Steven MacPherson, against
Order LD22-107 issued by the Director of
Residential Rental Property and dated April 12,
2022.
Compared and Certified a True Copy
(Sgd.) Susan Jefferson Commission Administrator Corporate Services and Appeals

Orders of The Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Order LR22-23 – Page 2 Docket LR22032 – Steven MacPherson v. Doris MacLeod Monday, May 9, 2022 This appeal asks the Commission to determine whether the Director of Residential Rental Property (the “Director”) erred in finding that an eviction notice was valid.
BACKGROUND
Steven MacPherson (“Mr. MacPherson”) has rented premises located at 28 Doncaster Avenue, Apartment #1, Charlottetown, PE (the “Premises”), from Doris MacLeod (“Ms.
MacLeod”) since 2015. Rent for the Premises is $600 per month and is due and payable on the first day of the month.
On March 4, 2022, Ms. MacLeod served Mr. MacPherson with a Notice of Termination by Lessor of Rental Agreement (“Form 4”) for non-payment of March 2022’s rent.
On March 28, 2022, Ms. MacLeod filed with the Director an Application for Enforcement of Statutory or Other Conditions of Rental Agreement requesting a finding that rent is owed; and order that an amount found to be owed be paid; and an order that possession of the Premises be surrendered to Ms. MacLeod.
Both applications were heard by the Director at the same time. In Order LD22-107 dated April 12, 2022, the Director found that the Form 4 was valid, and ordered that the rental agreement be terminated effective 5:00 p.m. on April 30, 2022. In Order LD22-108 dated April 12, 2022, the Director ordered that Mr. MacPherson pay Ms. MacLeod the sum of $1,200.
Mr. MacPherson appealed Order LD22-107.
The Commission heard the appeal on May 9, 2022. Ms. MacLeod and her son Trevor MacLeod participated by way of telephone conference call. Mr. MacPherson did not participate.
Disposition
The appeal is deemed abandoned and therefore dismissed.
The Issue Did the Director correctly determine that the Form 4 was valid?
Analysis
Mr. MacPherson did not participate in the hearing. The Commission noted on the record that Mr. MacPherson was provided with a Notice of Hearing by e-mail and received e-mail confirmation of delivery. In addition, Commission staff called Mr. MacPherson shortly after the start of the hearing, left a voicemail message and waited several more minutes before commencing the hearing. As Mr. MacPherson did not participate on his own appeal, the appeal is deemed to be abandoned and the appeal is dismissed.

Orders of The Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Order LR22-23 – Page 3 Docket LR22032 – Steven MacPherson v. Doris MacLeod Monday, May 9, 2022 Accordingly, Order LD22-107 remains in full force and effect.
NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Act and the Rental of Residential Property Act;
IT IS ORDERED THAT
1. The appeal is deemed abandoned and therefore is dismissed.
2. Director’s Order LD22-107 remains in full force and effect.
DATED at Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, the 9th day of May 2022.
BY THE COMMISSION:
(sgd. Erin T. Mitchell)

Panel Chair - Erin T. Mitchell, Commissioner
(sgd. M. Douglas Clow)

M. Douglas Clow, Vice-Chair
NOTICE
Subsections 26(2), 26(3), 26(4) and 26(5) of the Rental of Residential Property Act provides as follows:
26. (2) A lessor or lessee may, within fifteen days of the
decision of the Commission, appeal to the court on a question of law only.
(3) The rules of court governing appeals apply to an appeal under subsection (2).
(4) Where the Commission has confirmed, reversed, or varied an order of the Director and no appeal has been taken within the time specified in subsection (2), the lessor or lessee may file the order in the court.
(5) Where an order is filed pursuant to subsection (4), it may be enforced as if it were an order of the court.

Similar cases

Orders that share issues or RTA sections. Useful when comparing how similar facts were decided.

  • LD26-293granted · rto

    Application · eviction. Outcome: granted. I find that the Notice is invalid and the Application is allowed. The tenancy will continue and the Tenant may continue living in the Unit.

  • LD26-289granted · rto

    Landlord application · eviction. Outcome: granted. I find that the Notice is valid and the Application is allowed. [12] The Tenants and all occupants must vacate the Unit and return the Unit’s keys to…

  • LD26-286granted · rto

    Landlord application · abandonment. Outcome: granted. I find that the Landlords may dispose of the Personal Property listen on the Inventory on or after August 14, 2026.

  • LR26-38dismissed · irac

    Landlord appeal · eviction, rent increase, compensation. Outcome: dismissed. The Landlord's appeal is allowed in part. The Commission substitutes a finding that the Occupation Notice is valid. The rem…

  • LD26-281dismissed · rto

    Application · eviction, rent arrears. Outcome: dismissed. 1. The Application is dismissed because the Rental Office does not have jurisdiction to determine the dispute between the Applicant and the Re…

  • LD26-279granted · rto

    Landlord application · eviction, rent arrears. Outcome: granted. The Notice is valid and the Tenants and all occupants must vacate the Unit by the timeline below.

  • LD26-275granted · rto

    Application · eviction, disturbance, illegal activity. Outcome: granted. I find that the Notice is invalid and the Application is allowed. The tenancy will continue and the Tenant can continue living …

  • LD26-274granted · rto

    Landlord application · eviction, disturbance. Outcome: granted. The Notice is valid and the Tenant and all occupants must vacate the Unit by the timeline below.