← Back to orders

LR15-15

IRAC · June 18, 2015 · denied · Auto-indexed

Open saved PDFOriginal source ↗
Decision date
June 18, 2015
Outcome
denied
Issues
eviction
RTA sections
25, 26(2)

Quick summary

Auto-indexed

Appeal · eviction. Outcome: denied.

Linked prior order: LD15-195

Order text

Order LR15-15 - Rental Appeal - Docket LR15018 - Julie Gaudet and Thomas Argon v Director of Residential Rental Property Docket LR15018 Order LR15-15 IN THE MATTER of an appeal under Section 25 of the Rental of Residential Property Act , filed by Julie Gaudet and Thomas Argon against Order LD15-195 issued by the Director of Residential Rental Property on June 10, 2015. BEFORE THE COMMISSION on Thursday, the 18th day of June, 2015. John Broderick, Commissioner Michael Campbell, Commissioner Jean Tingley, Commissioner Order BACKGROUND On June 11, 2015 the Commission received a Notice of Appeal from two lessees, Julie Gaudet and Thomas Argon (the "Appellants"), requesting an appeal of Order LD15-195 dated June 10, 2015 issued by the Director of Residential Rental Property (the "Director"). By way of background, on May 19, 2015, the Appellants filed with the Director a Form 6 - Application by Lessee to Set Aside Notice of Termination together with Form 4 - Notice of Termination by Lessor of Rental Agreement dated May 13, 2015 signed by a lessor, Joe Corrigan (the "Respondent"). The matter was heard by the Director on May 28, 2015 and in Order LD15-195 the Director ordered: "IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT The lessees' application to set aside the Notice of Termination by Lessor of Rental Agreement (Form 6) is denied. The Notice of Termination by Lessor of Rental Agreement (Form 4) dated May 13, 2015 to be effective on June 13, 2015 is valid. The rental agreement between the lessees and the lessor for the residential premises is hereby terminated as of 12:00 midnight, June 13, 2015. The lessees shall vacate the residential premises on or before 12:00 midnight, June 13, 2015." The matter was heard by the Commission on June 18, 2015. The Appellants were present. The Respondent was also present. EVIDENCE The Appellants testified that they need to stay in the premises until the end of June 2015 to find another apartment. They also testified that they paid the rent for all of June 2015. The Respondent testified that he specifically requested that the Appellants pay rent for only half of June 2015; however, the Appellants paid the full month's rent to the Respondent's office when he was not present. The Respondent told the Commission that if the rental agreement were terminated prior to the end of June 2015 he would return the balance of the June rent on a pro-rated basis. DECISION The Commission agrees with the reasoning contained in Director's Order LD15-195. The rental agreement is hereby terminated as of 11:59 p.m. June 19, 2015. The Commission expects the Respondent to return the balance of June 2015 rent on a pro-rated basis. NOW THEREFORE , pursuant to the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Act and the Rental of Residential Property Act ; IT IS ORDERED THAT 1. The appeal is denied and Director's Order LD15-195 is confirmed in its entirety, subject to a revised date of termination for the rental agreement. 2. The rental agreement between the Appellants (lessees) and the Respondent (lessor) is hereby terminated effective 11:59 p.m. June 19, 2015. The Appellants shall vacate the residential premises on or before 11:59 p.m. June 19, 2015. 3. I f the Appellants fail to comply with the above terms, the Respondent may make application to the Director without further notice to the Appellants for an Order that possession of the residential premises be surrendered to the Respondent and directing the Sheriff to put the Respondent in possession of the residential premises. DATED at Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, this 18th day of June, 2015. BY THE COMMISSION : John Broderick, Commissioner Michael Campbell, Commissioner Jean Tingley, Commissioner NOTICE Sections 26.(2), 26.(3), 26.(4) and 26.(5) of the Rental of Residential Property Act provide as follows: 26.(2) A lessor or lessee may, within fifteen days of the decision of the Commission, appeal to the court on a question of law only. (3) The rules of court governing appeals apply to an appeal under subsection (2). (4) Where the Commission has confirmed, reversed or varied an order of the Director and no appeal has been taken within the time specified in subsection (2), the lessor or lessee may file the order in the court. (5) Where an order is filed pursuant to subsection (4), it may be enforced as if it were an order of the court. NOTICE: IRAC File Retention In accordance with the Commission's Records Retention and Disposition Schedule, the material contained in the official file regarding this matter will be retained by the Commission for a period of 2 years.

Similar cases

Orders that share issues or RTA sections. Useful when comparing how similar facts were decided.

  • LD26-293granted · rto

    Application · eviction. Outcome: granted. I find that the Notice is invalid and the Application is allowed. The tenancy will continue and the Tenant may continue living in the Unit.

  • LD26-289granted · rto

    Landlord application · eviction. Outcome: granted. I find that the Notice is valid and the Application is allowed. [12] The Tenants and all occupants must vacate the Unit and return the Unit’s keys to…

  • LR26-38dismissed · irac

    Landlord appeal · eviction, rent increase, compensation. Outcome: dismissed. The Landlord's appeal is allowed in part. The Commission substitutes a finding that the Occupation Notice is valid. The rem…

  • LD26-281dismissed · rto

    Application · eviction, rent arrears. Outcome: dismissed. 1. The Application is dismissed because the Rental Office does not have jurisdiction to determine the dispute between the Applicant and the Re…

  • LD26-279granted · rto

    Landlord application · eviction, rent arrears. Outcome: granted. The Notice is valid and the Tenants and all occupants must vacate the Unit by the timeline below.

  • LD26-275granted · rto

    Application · eviction, disturbance, illegal activity. Outcome: granted. I find that the Notice is invalid and the Application is allowed. The tenancy will continue and the Tenant can continue living …

  • LD26-274granted · rto

    Landlord application · eviction, disturbance. Outcome: granted. The Notice is valid and the Tenant and all occupants must vacate the Unit by the timeline below.

  • LD26-268granted · rto

    Application · eviction, disturbance, illegal activity. Outcome: granted. The tenancy will continue in full force and effect.