← Back to orders

LR17-02A

IRAC · May 19, 2017 · unknown · Auto-indexed

Open saved PDFOriginal source ↗
Decision date
May 19, 2017
RTA sections
25, 26(2)

Quick summary

Auto-indexed

Appeal · other. Outcome: outcome pending review.

Linked prior order: LD17-092

Order text

Order LR17-02A - Rental Appeal - Docket LR17006 - Irwin Newman and Serita Newman v Director of Residential Rental Property Docket LR17006 Order LR17-02A IN THE MATTER of an appeal under Section 25 of the Rental of Residential Property Act by Irwin Newman and Serita Newman against Order LD17-092 dated March 29, 2017 issued by the Office of the Director of Residential Rental Property. BEFORE THE COMMISSION on Friday, the 19th day of May, 2017. John Broderick, Commissioner M. Douglas Clow, Vice-Chair Jean Tingley, Commissioner Order BACKGROUND On April 17, 2017 the Commission received a Notice of Appeal from two lessees, Irwin and Serita Newman (the "Appellants"), requesting an appeal of Order LD17-092 dated March 29, 2017 issued by the Director of Residential Rental Property (the "Director"). By way of background, on October 6, 2016, the lessors, Scott and Gail Ferris (the "Respondents") filed with the Director the following documents: Form 2 - Application for Enforcement of Statutory or Other Conditions of Rental Agreement seeking an Order to authorize the discontinuance of a service and an appropriate adjustment to the rent; Form 12 - Application by Lessor for Approval of Rent Increase Exceeding Percentage Allowed by Regulation; and Form 15 - Lessor's Statement of Income and Expenses. The matter was heard by the Director on November 1, 2016 and in Order LD17-092 the Director ordered: "IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT The lessors' application for the discontinuance of provision of electrical service for the residential premises is hereby approved. The change of service for the residential premises shall be effective June 1, 2017." The Commission heard the appeal on May 19, 2017. Both the Appellants and the Respondents were present. EVIDENCE The Appellants testified that discontinuing the provision of electrical service effectively amounts to a large increase in their rent and they did not expect such a large and sudden increase. The Appellants also pointed out some Form 15 line entries that they feel were for both sides of the duplex.They noted that no work has been done to the windows. They testified that they began renting the residential premises in October 2014. The Respondents acknowledged that the window thermopanes have not been replaced as yet. The Respondents stated that the Appellants have been very good tenants.The Respondents testified that they are currently injecting their own funds to meet the expenses of the residential premises. By discontinuing the provision of electrical service the Respondents hope to break even financially. The Respondents also clarified the Form 15 line entries in their testimony. DECISION The Commission has reviewed the Form 15 Lessor's Statement of Income and Expenses along with the comments by both parties with respect to the various line entries. The Commission has re-calculated the Form 15 based on this testimony. The Commission finds that the decision made by the Director in Director's Order LD17-092 is reasonable and fair. The Commission varies the change of service date to August 1, 2017. NOW THEREFORE , pursuant to the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Act and the Rental of Residential Property Act ; IT IS ORDERED THAT The Commission upholds the decision of the Director in Order LD17-092 to approve the Respondent's lessors' application for the discontinuance of provision of electrial service for the residential premises. The change of service for the residential premises shall be effective August 1, 2017. DATED at Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, this 19 th day of May , 2017 . BY THE COMMISSION : John Broderick Commissioner M. Douglas Clow, Vice-Chair Jean Tingley, Commisisoner NOTICE Sections 26.(2), 26.(3), 26.(4) and 26.(5) of the Rental of Residential Property Act provide as follows: 26.(2) A lessor or lessee may, within fifteen days of the decision of the Commission, appeal to the court on a question of law only. (3) The rules of court governing appeals apply to an appeal under subsection (2). (4) Where the Commission has confirmed, reversed or varied an order of the Director and no appeal has been taken within the time specified in subsection (2), the lessor or lessee may file the order in the court. (5) Where an order is filed pursuant to subsection (4), it may be enforced as if it were an order of the court. NOTICE: IRAC File Retention In accordance with the Commission's Records Retention and Disposition Schedule, the material contained in the official file regarding this matter will be retained by the Commission for a period of 2 years.

Similar cases

Orders that share issues or RTA sections. Useful when comparing how similar facts were decided.

  • LD26-296granted · rto

    Tenant application · other. Outcome: granted. The Landlord must pay the Tenant $1,437.88 by the timeline below.

  • LD26-294granted · rto

    Application · other. Outcome: granted. I find that the Parking Spot is already an included service or facility in the Tenant’s rent. The Landlords must not charge the Tenant a separate fee regarding t…

  • LR26-37granted · irac

    Landlord appeal · other. Outcome: granted. The Appeal is denied and the Rental Office decision LD26-125 is confirmed. The Landlords and Bhaskar are liable to pay the Tenant a return of rent and double…

  • LR26-36dismissed · irac

    Appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The appeal is dismissed. The Commission agrees with the finding of Order LD26-130 that the parties did not have a landlord-tenant relationship, or a tenancy agreeme…

  • LR26-35dismissed · irac

    Tenant appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Appeal is denied and the Rental Office’s Order LD26-161 is upheld. The Tenant shall return the Subtenant’s security deposit in the amount of $500.00, plu…

  • LD26-238granted · rto

    Tenant application · other. Outcome: granted. The Landlord must pay the Tenant $2,256.15. This amount includes the original security deposit ($1,100.00), the $56.15 in accrued interest on the original…

  • LR26-34dismissed · irac

    Landlord appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Appeal is dismissed. Order LD26-118 is confirmed. The Landlord and Bhaskar remain jointly and severally liable to pay the Tenants a return of rent toge…

  • LR26-33dismissed · irac

    Landlord appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Appeal is dismissed. Order LD26-131 is confirmed. The Landlord and Bhaskar remain jointly and severally liable to pay the Tenant a return of rent toget…