← Back to orders

LR22-62

IRAC · November 1, 2022 · dismissed · Auto-indexed

Open saved PDFOriginal source ↗
Decision date
November 1, 2022
Panel / officer
M. Douglas Clow
Applicant
tenant
Tenant
Rob Brown and Hayley Cormier
Outcome
dismissed
Issues
eviction
RTA sections
25, 16, 26(2)

Quick summary

Auto-indexed

Tenant appeal · eviction. Outcome: dismissed. The appeal is dismissed and Director’s Order LD22-337 is confirmed. The Issue Did the Director correctly determine that the Form 4 dated August 25, 2022 was valid?

Linked prior order: LD22-337

Order text

Docket LR22065 – Rob Brown & Hayley Cormier v. 102675 PEI Inc. Tuesday, November 1, 2022 Docket: LR22065
Order: LR22-62
BEFORE THE COMMISSION ON Tuesday, November 1, 2022 Panel Chair - Erin T. Mitchell, Commissioner
M. Douglas Clow, Vice-Chair
Hearing Date: Wednesday, October 26, 2022
ORDER
IN THE MATTER of an appeal, under section 25 of the Rental of Residential Property Act (the “Act”), filed by Rob Brown and Hayley Cormier against Order LD22-337 issued by the Director of Residential Rental Property and dated September 22, 2022.
Compared and Certified a True Copy
(Sgd.) Susan Jefferson Commission Administrator Corporate Services and Appeals

Orders of The Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Order LR22-62 - Page 2 Docket LR22065 – Rob Brown & Hayley Cormier v. 102675 PEI Inc. Tuesday, November 1, 2022 This appeal asks the Commission to determine whether the Director of Residential Rental Property (the “Director”) erred in finding that an eviction notice was valid.
BACKGROUND
Rob Brown and Hayley Cormier (the “Tenants”) rent premises located at 279 Fitzroy Street, Apartment #4, Summerside, PE (the “Premises”), from 102675 PEI Inc. (the “Landlord”).
On August 25, 2022, a representative of the Landlord served a Notice of Termination by Lessor of Rental Agreement (“Form 4”) on the Tenants citing breaches of clauses 14(1)(a), 14(1)(b) and 14(1)(e) of the Act. The effective date of the Form 4 was September 26,
2022.
On September 9, 2022, the Landlord filed with the Director an Application by Lessor for Earlier Termination (“Form 5”) seeking to terminate the rental agreement effective September 15, 2022.
In Order LD22-337 dated September 22, 2022, the Director ordered that the Form 4 was valid and that Tenants vacate the Premises by 11:59 p.m. on September 26, 2022.
The Tenants appealed the Order.
The Commission heard the appeal on October 26, 2022. The Tenant Rob Brown (“Mr.
Brown”) participated by way of telephone conference call. The Landlord was represented by Acel O'Connor, George Villaluz and Abhi Matthews (“Mr. Matthews”). Richard Clements (“Mr. Clements”) and Lacey Lynn Arsenault (“Ms. Arsenault”) testified on behalf of the Landlord.
Disposition
The appeal is dismissed and Director’s Order LD22-337 is confirmed.
The Issue Did the Director correctly determine that the Form 4 dated August 25, 2022 was valid?
Analysis
The Landlord seeks to evict Mr. Brown due to his alleged smoking in the building.
The Landlord contends that the building is a non-smoking building and Mr. Brown does not dispute this. Mr. Brown acknowledges smoking in the Premises, and acknowledges receiving a no smoking policy notice in April 2022. He maintains that he stopped smoking in the Premises three weeks ago.
Mr. Brown testified that there are others in the building who also smoke and who aren’t being evicted. Mr. Matthews testified that he is not aware of others smoking in the building, and if there are others, they will also be evicted.

Orders of The Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Order LR22-62 - Page 3 Docket LR22065 – Rob Brown & Hayley Cormier v. 102675 PEI Inc. Tuesday, November 1, 2022 Mr. Brown did not file a Form 6 application to set aside the August 25, 2022 Form 4. The requirement to file a set aside application and the deadlines and procedure is set out in section 16 of the Act. By not filing the Form 6 set aside application, Mr. Brown is deemed to have agreed with the provisions of the Form 4 which provided for a termination date of September 26, 2022. The Landlord also filed a Form 5 seeking a termination of the rental agreement on September 15, 2022. In Order LD22-337, the Director found that an earlier termination was warranted; however, the Director found that the termination date should remain September 26, 2022 given the date of the hearing.
As Mr. Brown did not file a set aside as required under section 16 of the Act, the Commission confirms the outcome of Director’s Order LD22-337 and the appeal is dismissed.
NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Act and the Rental of Residential Property Act;
IT IS ORDERED THAT
1. The appeal is dismissed.
2. Director’s Order LD22-337 is confirmed.
DATED at Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Tuesday, November 1, 2022.
BY THE COMMISSION:
(sgd. Erin T. Mitchell)

Panel Chair - Erin T. Mitchell, Commissioner
(sgd. M. Douglas Clow)

M. Douglas Clow, Vice-Chair
NOTICE
Subsections 26(2), 26(3), 26(4) and 26(5) of the Rental of Residential Property Act provides as follows:
26. (2) A lessor or lessee may, within fifteen days of the
decision of the Commission, appeal to the court on a question of law only.
(3) The rules of court governing appeals apply to an appeal under subsection (2).
(4) Where the Commission has confirmed, reversed, or varied an order of the Director and no appeal has been taken within the time specified in subsection (2), the lessor or lessee may file the order in the court.
(5) Where an order is filed pursuant to subsection (4), it may be enforced as if it were an order of the court.

Similar cases

Orders that share issues or RTA sections. Useful when comparing how similar facts were decided.

  • LD26-293granted · rto

    Application · eviction. Outcome: granted. I find that the Notice is invalid and the Application is allowed. The tenancy will continue and the Tenant may continue living in the Unit.

  • LD26-289granted · rto

    Landlord application · eviction. Outcome: granted. I find that the Notice is valid and the Application is allowed. [12] The Tenants and all occupants must vacate the Unit and return the Unit’s keys to…

  • LR26-38dismissed · irac

    Landlord appeal · eviction, rent increase, compensation. Outcome: dismissed. The Landlord's appeal is allowed in part. The Commission substitutes a finding that the Occupation Notice is valid. The rem…

  • LD26-281dismissed · rto

    Application · eviction, rent arrears. Outcome: dismissed. 1. The Application is dismissed because the Rental Office does not have jurisdiction to determine the dispute between the Applicant and the Re…

  • LD26-279granted · rto

    Landlord application · eviction, rent arrears. Outcome: granted. The Notice is valid and the Tenants and all occupants must vacate the Unit by the timeline below.

  • LD26-275granted · rto

    Application · eviction, disturbance, illegal activity. Outcome: granted. I find that the Notice is invalid and the Application is allowed. The tenancy will continue and the Tenant can continue living …

  • LD26-274granted · rto

    Landlord application · eviction, disturbance. Outcome: granted. The Notice is valid and the Tenant and all occupants must vacate the Unit by the timeline below.

  • LD26-268granted · rto

    Application · eviction, disturbance, illegal activity. Outcome: granted. The tenancy will continue in full force and effect.