Quick summary
Auto-indexedAppeal · other. Outcome: outcome pending review.
Linked prior order: LD08-226
Order text
Order LR08-07 - Rental Appeal - Docket LR08-009 - Darren MacLennan v. Director of Residential Rental Property Docket LR08009 Order LR08-07 IN THE MATTER of an appeal, under Section 25 of the Rental of Residential Property Act , by Darren MacLennan against Order No. LD08-226 of the Director of Residential Rental Property, dated June 3, 2008. BEFORE THE COMMISSION on Monday, the 30th day of June, 2008. Maurice Rodgerson, Chair Brian J. McKenna, Vice Chair Order On June 17, 2008, the Commission received a Notice of Appeal filed by the Appellant Darren MacLennan (Mr. MacLennan). Mr. MacLennan appealed Order No. LD08-226 issued by the Office of the Director of Residential Rental Property (the Director) on June 3, 2008. At issue is whether Mr. MacLennan may appeal Order LD08-226 pursuant to the right of appeal under the Rental of Residential Property Act (the Act ). Subsections 25(1) and 25(3) of the Act read as follows: 25. (1) Any party to a decision or order of the Director, if the party has appeared or been represented at the hearing before the Director , may appeal therefrom by serving on the Commission, within twenty days after receipt of the decision or order of the Director, a notice of appeal in the form prescribed by regulation. [Emphasis added] � (3) Where an appeal is not made under subsection (1), the parties are deemed to have accepted the decision of the Director and the decision is final. 1988,c.58,s.25; 1990,c.53,s.7; 1991,c.34,s.1,2; 1991,c.18,s.22 {eff.} Nov. 4/91. Subsection 33(3) reads as follows: 33. (3) Where a document is delivered by ordinary mail, it is deemed to have been delivered on the third day after the date of mailing. 1988,c.58,s.33; 1991,c.18,s.22 {eff.} Nov. 4/91. The Commission has had the opportunity to review the file provided by the Director. The Commission finds that Mr. MacLennan was not present at the hearing before the Director held on November 13, 2007. Further, the Commission finds that Mr. MacLennan was not represented at the hearing before the Director. The Commission also finds that Mr. MacLennan was deemed to have received the October 29, 2007 Notice of Hearing on November 1, 2007, pursuant to subsection 33(3) of the Act . Subsection 25(1) of the Act provides a conditional right of appeal. The right to appeal is available only if the appellant was present or was represented at the hearing before the Director. As Mr. MacLennan was neither present at the November 13, 2007 hearing before the Director nor represented at that hearing, subsection 25(1) of the Act does not provide him with a right of appeal and this appeal is hereby dismissed. NOW THEREFORE , pursuant to the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Act and the Rental of Residential Property Act : IT IS ORDERED THAT 1. The appeal is hereby dismissed. 2. Order LD08-226 issued by the Office of the Director of Residential Rental Property on June 3, 2008 remains in full force and effect. DATED at Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, this 30th day of June, 2008. BY THE COMMISSION : Maurice Rodgerson, Chair Brian J. McKenna, Vice-Chair NOTICE Sections 26.(2), 26.(3), 26.(4) and 26.(5) of the Rental of Residential Property Act provide as follows: 26.(2) A lessor or lessee may, within fifteen days of the decision of the Commission, appeal to the court on a question of law only. (3) The rules of court governing appeals apply to an appeal under subsection (2). (4) Where the Commission has confirmed, reversed or varied an order of the Director and no appeal has been taken within the time specified in subsection (2), the lessor or lessee may file the order in the court. (5) Where an order is filed pursuant to subsection (4), it may be enforced as if it were an order of the court.Similar cases
Orders that share issues or RTA sections. Useful when comparing how similar facts were decided.
- LD26-296granted · rto
Tenant application · other. Outcome: granted. The Landlord must pay the Tenant $1,437.88 by the timeline below.
- LD26-294granted · rto
Application · other. Outcome: granted. I find that the Parking Spot is already an included service or facility in the Tenant’s rent. The Landlords must not charge the Tenant a separate fee regarding t…
- LR26-37granted · irac
Landlord appeal · other. Outcome: granted. The Appeal is denied and the Rental Office decision LD26-125 is confirmed. The Landlords and Bhaskar are liable to pay the Tenant a return of rent and double…
- LR26-36dismissed · irac
Appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The appeal is dismissed. The Commission agrees with the finding of Order LD26-130 that the parties did not have a landlord-tenant relationship, or a tenancy agreeme…
- LR26-35dismissed · irac
Tenant appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Appeal is denied and the Rental Office’s Order LD26-161 is upheld. The Tenant shall return the Subtenant’s security deposit in the amount of $500.00, plu…
- LD26-238granted · rto
Tenant application · other. Outcome: granted. The Landlord must pay the Tenant $2,256.15. This amount includes the original security deposit ($1,100.00), the $56.15 in accrued interest on the original…
- LR26-34dismissed · irac
Landlord appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Appeal is dismissed. Order LD26-118 is confirmed. The Landlord and Bhaskar remain jointly and severally liable to pay the Tenants a return of rent toge…
- LR26-33dismissed · irac
Landlord appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Appeal is dismissed. Order LD26-131 is confirmed. The Landlord and Bhaskar remain jointly and severally liable to pay the Tenant a return of rent toget…