← Back to orders

LR21-27

IRAC · August 9, 2021 · denied · Auto-indexed

Open saved PDFOriginal source ↗
Decision date
August 9, 2021
Panel / officer
M. Douglas Clow
Outcome
denied
Issues
eviction
RTA sections
25, 26(2)

Quick summary

Auto-indexed

Appeal · eviction. Outcome: denied. The appeal is denied. The Issue Did the Director correctly determine that the Form 4 dated June 2, 2021 was invalid?

Linked prior order: LD21-227

Order text

Docket LR21025 – Cardon Enterprises Inc. v. Kevin MacEwen Monday, August 9, 2021 Docket: LR21025
Order: LR21-27
BEFORE THE COMMISSION ON Monday, August 9, 2021.
Panel Chair - Erin T. Mitchell, Commissioner
M. Douglas Clow, Vice-Chair
Hearing Date: Tuesday, July 20, 2021
ORDER
IN THE MATTER of an appeal, under section 25 of the Rental of Residential Property Act (the “Act”), filed by Cardon Enterprises Inc., against
Order LR21-227 issued by the Director of
Residential Rental Property and dated June 21,
2021.
Compared and Certified a True Copy
(Sgd.) Susan Jefferson Commission Administrator Corporate Services and Appeals

Orders of The Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Order LR21-27– Page 2 Docket LR21025– Cardon Enterprises Inc. v. Kevin MacEwen Monday, August 9, 2021 This appeal asks the Commission to determine whether the Director erred in finding that an eviction notice was not valid.
BACKGROUND
Cardon Enterprises Inc. rented premises located at 73 St. Peter’s Road, Apartment #1, Charlottetown, PE, to Kevin MacEwen (“Mr. MacEwen”) commencing in June, 2017. The parties dispute the amount of rent payable each month.
On June 2, 2021, the landlord’s representative, Carman MacArthur (“Mr. MacArthur”) served a Notice of Termination by Lessor of Rental Agreement (“Form 4”) on Mr. MacEwen citing failure to pay rent in the amount of $3,758.00. The effective date of the Form 4 was June 21, 2021.
On June 4, 2021, Mr. MacEwen filed with the Director of Residential Rental Property (the “Director”) an Application by Lessee to Set Aside Notice of Termination (“Form 6”).
In Order LD21-227 dated June 21, 2021, the Director ordered that the Form 4 was invalid, the Form 6 was allowed, and that the rental agreement remain in full force and effect with the monthly rental being set at $600.00 per month.
Cardon Enterprises Inc. appealed.
The Commission heard the appeal on July 20, 2021. Mr. MacArthur and Mr. MacEwen both participated by way of telephone conference call.
Disposition
The appeal is denied.
The Issue Did the Director correctly determine that the Form 4 dated June 2, 2021 was invalid?
Analysis
Mr. MacArthur advised that the rent was originally $650.00 per month, with $50.00 paid by Holland College and $600.00 paid by Mr. MacEwen, both payments due on the first of each month. Mr. MacArthur referred to Exhibit E-9 which contains a Tenant Information Sheet and two pages of Rental Records. He also claims increases in the rent based on the allowable annual increase set by the Commission. He claims that he is owed money for rent in the amount of $3,758.00 as stated on the Form 4.
There is no standard form written rental agreement between the parties.
In Order LD19-311, dated July 19, 2019, the Director previously established the rent as $600.00 per month, payable in two payments on the first and fifteenth of each month. Mr.
MacArthur did not pursue an appeal of Order LD19-311.

Orders of The Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Order LR21-27– Page 3 Docket LR21025– Cardon Enterprises Inc. v. Kevin MacEwen Monday, August 9, 2021 Mr. MacArthur has appealed Order LD21-227.
When a landlord makes a claim for rent owing, the onus is on that landlord to establish the rent owing based on clear and complete records.
Mr. MacEwen provided numerous receipts for the past payment of rent.
Mr. MacArthur has provided Exhibit E-9 to the Commission following the filing of his appeal. The Commission finds that Exhibit E-9 is not a clear and complete record. Indeed, there are significant discrepancies between the Rental Records provided by Mr.
MacArthur and the receipts provided by Mr. MacEwen.
The onus is on Mr. MacArthur to establish his claim and he ought to be in possession of his own complete rental business records. The Commission finds that there is insufficient evidence, on a balance of probabilities, to establish that the Director erred in the findings set out in Order LD21-227.
Accordingly, the appeal is denied.
NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Act and the Rental of Residential Property Act;
IT IS ORDERED THAT
1. The appeal is denied.
2. Director’s Order LD21-227 is confirmed.
DATED at Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Monday, August 9, 2021
BY THE COMMISSION:
(sgd. Erin T. Mitchell)

Panel Chair - Erin T. Mitchell, Commissioner
(sgd. M. Douglas Clow)

M. Douglas Clow, Vice-Chair
NOTICE
Subsections 26(2), 26(3), 26(4) and 26(5) of the Rental of Residential Property Act provides as follows:
26. (2) A lessor or lessee may, within fifteen days of the
decision of the Commission, appeal to the court on a question of law only.

Orders of The Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Order LR21-27– Page 4 Docket LR21025– Cardon Enterprises Inc. v. Kevin MacEwen Monday, August 9, 2021 (3) The rules of court governing appeals apply to an appeal under subsection (2).
(4) Where the Commission has confirmed, reversed, or varied an order of the Director and no appeal has been taken within the time specified in subsection (2), the lessor or lessee may file the order in the court.
(5) Where an order is filed pursuant to subsection (4), it may be enforced as if it were an order of the court.

Similar cases

Orders that share issues or RTA sections. Useful when comparing how similar facts were decided.

  • LD26-293granted · rto

    Application · eviction. Outcome: granted. I find that the Notice is invalid and the Application is allowed. The tenancy will continue and the Tenant may continue living in the Unit.

  • LD26-289granted · rto

    Landlord application · eviction. Outcome: granted. I find that the Notice is valid and the Application is allowed. [12] The Tenants and all occupants must vacate the Unit and return the Unit’s keys to…

  • LR26-38dismissed · irac

    Landlord appeal · eviction, rent increase, compensation. Outcome: dismissed. The Landlord's appeal is allowed in part. The Commission substitutes a finding that the Occupation Notice is valid. The rem…

  • LD26-281dismissed · rto

    Application · eviction, rent arrears. Outcome: dismissed. 1. The Application is dismissed because the Rental Office does not have jurisdiction to determine the dispute between the Applicant and the Re…

  • LD26-279granted · rto

    Landlord application · eviction, rent arrears. Outcome: granted. The Notice is valid and the Tenants and all occupants must vacate the Unit by the timeline below.

  • LD26-275granted · rto

    Application · eviction, disturbance, illegal activity. Outcome: granted. I find that the Notice is invalid and the Application is allowed. The tenancy will continue and the Tenant can continue living …

  • LD26-274granted · rto

    Landlord application · eviction, disturbance. Outcome: granted. The Notice is valid and the Tenant and all occupants must vacate the Unit by the timeline below.

  • LD26-268granted · rto

    Application · eviction, disturbance, illegal activity. Outcome: granted. The tenancy will continue in full force and effect.