← Back to orders

LR23-46

IRAC · August 28, 2023 · dismissed · Auto-indexed

Open saved PDFOriginal source ↗
Decision date
August 28, 2023
Panel / officer
M. Douglas Clow
Applicant
tenant
Landlord
Daniel Cantin
Tenant
Kim Coughlin
Outcome
dismissed
Issues
abandonment
RTA sections
4, 26(2)

Quick summary

Auto-indexed

Tenant appeal · abandonment. Outcome: dismissed. The Commission is satisfied that both parties were made fully aware of the date, time and method of participation for the hearing. The Tenant filed an appeal but failed to participate at the hearing. The Commission therefore deems the appeal to be abandoned and thus the appeal is

Linked prior order: LD23-353

Order text

Date Issued: August 28, 2023 Docket: LR23065 Type: Rental Appeal
INDEXED AS: Kim Coughlin v. Daniel Cantin
Order No: LR23-46
BETWEEN:
Kim Coughlin Appellant
AND:
Daniel Cantin Respondent
ORDER
Panel Members: M. Douglas Clow, Vice-Chair
Murray MacPherson, Commissioner Compared and Certified a True Copy
(Sgd.) Susan Jefferson Commission Administrator Corporate Services and Appeals

2
1. INTRODUCTION
1. This appeal was heard by the Commission on August 28, 2023, and asks the Commission to determine whether the Director of Residential Rental Property (the “Director”) erred in finding that a landlord does not owe rent to a tenant.
2. BACKGROUND
2. In December, 2022, Kim Coughlin (the “Tenant”) entered into a verbal rental agreement for a mini-home trailer located at 1 Vivianlee Court, Summerside, PE (the “Premises”) with Daniel Cantin (the “Landlord”). The Tenant paid the Landlord $700 to be able to move into the Premises on December 15, 2022 and then rent for the Premises would be $1400 per month due on the first day of the month. No security deposit was paid.
3. On December 14, 2022, the Tenant advised the Landlord that she would not be moving into the Premises.
4. On January 5, 2023, the Tenant filed with the Director a Form 2 (“the “Application”) requesting a finding that rent is owed and an order than an amount found to be owed be paid.
5. In Order LR23-353 dated July 27, 2023, the Director denied the Application.
6. On August 8, 2023, the Tenant filed an appeal with the Commission.
7. As this matter commenced prior to April 8, 2023, the Residential Rental Property Act (the “RRPA”) applies to this appeal.
8. The Commission heard the appeal by way of telephone conference call on August 28,
2023. Neither the Tenant nor the Landlord participated.
9. At the hearing, Commission staff reviewed on the record the emails and reminder emails sent to both parties to advise them of the date, time and method of participation for the hearing.
3. DISPOSITION
10. The Commission is satisfied that both parties were made fully aware of the date, time and method of participation for the hearing. The Tenant filed an appeal but failed to participate at the hearing. The Commission therefore deems the appeal to be abandoned and thus the appeal is dismissed.

3
IT IS ORDERED THAT
1. The appeal is dismissed as the Tenant abandoned the appeal.
2. Order LD23-353 remains in full force and effect.
DATED at Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Monday, August 28, 2023.
BY THE COMMISSION:
(sgd. M. Douglas Clow)
M. Douglas Clow, Vice-Chair
(sgd. Murray MacPherson) Murray MacPherson, Commissioner
NOTICE
Subsections 26(2), 26(3), 26(4) and 26(5) of the Rental of Residential Property Act provides as follows:
26. (2) A lessor or lessee may, within fifteen days of the
decision of the Commission, appeal to the court on a question of law only.
(3) The rules of court governing appeals apply to an appeal under subsection (2).
(4) Where the Commission has confirmed, reversed, or varied an order of the Director and no appeal has been taken within the time specified in subsection (2), the lessor or lessee may file the order in the court.
(5) Where an order is filed pursuant to subsection (4), it may be enforced as if it were an order of the court.

Similar cases

Orders that share issues or RTA sections. Useful when comparing how similar facts were decided.

  • LD26-286granted · rto

    Landlord application · abandonment. Outcome: granted. I find that the Landlords may dispose of the Personal Property listen on the Inventory on or after August 14, 2026.

  • LD26-271granted · rto

    Landlord application · abandonment. Outcome: granted. I find that the Landlord may dispose of the Personal Property on or after July 31, 2026.

  • LD26-264denied · rto

    Application · compensation, abandonment. Outcome: denied. 1. The Application is denied.

  • LD26-242granted · rto

    Landlord application · abandonment. Outcome: granted. The Landlord may dispose of the Personal Property in the Inventory List on the terms provided below.

  • LD26-215granted · rto

    Application · security deposit, abandonment. Outcome: granted. I find that the tenancy will continue and the Tenant can continue living in the Unit. [4] The Landlord is prohibited from removing person…

  • LR26-30dismissed · irac

    Tenant appeal · abandonment. Outcome: dismissed. The appeal is deemed abandoned in accordance with Rule 29(1)(d) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure.

  • LR26-28dismissed · irac

    Tenant appeal · security deposit, rent arrears, abandonment. Outcome: dismissed.

  • LR26-25dismissed · irac

    Tenant appeal · abandonment. Outcome: dismissed. The appeal is deemed abandoned in accordance with Rule 29(1)(d) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure.