LR04-20

Appeal · other. Outcome: denied.

Linked prior order: LD04-277

Order text

Order LR04-20 - Rental Appeal - A-021-04 Re: Donald Wright v. Director of Residential Rental Property (Order LD04-20) Docket A-021-04 Order LR04-20 IN THE MATTER of an appeal, under Section 25 of the Rental of Residential Property Act , by Donald Wright against Order No. LD04-277 of the Director of Residential Rental Property dated November 12, 2004. BEFORE THE COMMISSION on Thursday, the 25th day of November, 2004. Weston Rose, Commissioner Brian J. McKenna, Vice-Chair Kathy Kennedy, Commissioner Order Participants 1. Appellant: Donald Wright 2. Respondent: Betty Morrison and Wayne Bevan for Bevan Enterprises Inc. Reasons for Order 1. Introduction Donald Wright (the Appellant) appealed Order LD04-277 (Exhibit E-5) issued by the Office of the Director of Residential Rental Property (the Director) on November 12, 2004. The Appellant's Notice of Appeal (Exhibit E-6) was received by the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission (the Commission) on November 16, 2004. The Director's Order and this present appeal concern apartment #4 located at 94 King Street in Charlottetown (the apartment). The appeal was heard in the Commission's main hearing room in Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island on Monday, November 22, 2004. 2. Background The Appellant entered into a Standard Form of Rental Agreement (Form 1) dated November 14, 2002 (rental agreement) (Exhibit E-4.1) with Bevan Enterprises Inc. (the Respondent). On September 28, 2004, the Respondent wrote the Appellant (Exhibit E-1.1) expressing concerns about the Appellant using an electrical extension cord connected to the Respondent's outlet. The Respondent's letter of September 28, 2004 to the Appellant noted that the Respondent does not supply electrical power to tenants. The Respondent filed a Notice of Termination by Lessor of Rental Agreement (Form 4) dated October 22, 2004. In the Notice of Termination by Lessor of Rental Agreement (Form 4), the reason for termination of the rental agreement was checked as paragraph (g) which reads as follows: (g) An act or omission on your part or on the part of a person permitted in or on the residential premises/property by you has seriously impaired the safety or lawful right or interest of me or other lessees in the residential property (s.14(1)(e) of Act); The particulars of termination read as follows: Wayne observed your electrical cord plugged into the hallway power last night. You received the attached letter Sept 28th and you came into the office and denied doing it. On October 29, 2004, the Appellant filed an Application by Lessee to Set Aside Notice of Termination (Form 6). This application reads in part: First, Wayne Bevan is charging me with theft (note attached letter signed by Betty Morrison � Bevan's tenant agent). The theft that he is bringing this eviction or termination of rental agreement is because on a few, not more than six or seven times, since May of 2004. The Appellant goes on to note in part that the electrical cord was to provide electricity for a small lamp, that it was normally plugged into the wall outlet of a neighbouring tenant, that the Appellant paid the other tenant for the use of his electricity, that the Appellant on occasion had a "falling out" with that tenant and that on those occasions, the hallway outlet was used instead. 3. Decision The appeal is denied for the reasons which follow. The Appellant has acknowledged, both in writing and at the hearing before the Commission, that he used the Respondent's electricity. A review of the rental agreement reveals that the rent paid does not include electricity. Section 14(1)(e) of the Rental of Residential Property Act reads as follows: 14. (1) The lessor may also serve a notice of termination upon the lessee where � (e) the safety or other lawful right or interest of the lessor or other lessee in the residential property has been seriously impaired by an act or omission of the lessee or a person permitted in or on the residential property or residential premises by him; The Commission finds that the Appellant seriously impaired the interest of the Respondent by using the electricity paid for by the Respondent without any lawful right to do so. Accordingly, the Commission finds that the appeal is denied. Given that the Appellant has paid rent for the month of November 2004 in full, the Commission hereby orders the Appellant to vacate the apartment on or before November 30, 2004. In the testimony heard by the Commission, it was revealed that the electricity for the light outside the Appellant's apartment door was paid by the Appellant before his electricity was cut off. The Commission wishes to point out to the Respondent that lighting for all common areas and hallways, including the light over an apartment entrance, should be connected to the landlord's meter unless a tenant specifically agrees, in the rental agreement, to pay for this electricity. Order WHEREAS Donald W right appealed Order LD04-277 of the Director of Residential Rental Property, dated November 12, 2004; AND WHEREAS the Commission heard the appeal in Charlottetown on November 22, 2004; NOW THEREFORE , for the reasons given in the annexed Reasons for Order; IT IS ORDERED THAT The appeal is denied. The Appellant, Donald Wright, shall vacate the apartment on or before November 30, 2004. DATED at Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, this 25th day of November, 2004. BY THE COMMISSION : Weston Rose, Commissioner Brian J. McKenna, Vice-Chair Kathy Kennedy, Commissioner NOTICE Sections 26.(2), 26.(3), 26.(4) and 26.(5) of the Rental of Residential Property Act provide as follows: 26.(2) A lessor or lessee may, within fifteen days of the decision of the Commission, appeal to the court on a question of law only. (3) The rules of court governing appeals apply to an appeal under subsection (2). (4) Where the Commission has confirmed, reversed or varied an order of the Director and no appeal has been taken within the time specified in subsection (2), the lessor or lessee may file the order in the court. (5) Where an order is filed pursuant to subsection (4), it may be enforced as if it were an order of the court.