← Back to orders

LD23-410

RTO · September 1, 2023 · granted · Auto-indexed

Open saved PDFOriginal source ↗
Decision date
September 1, 2023
Rental officer
Mitchell King
Applicant
tenant
Outcome
granted
Issues
eviction, repairs, disturbance
RTA sections
59, 61(1)(d)(i), 30

Quick summary

Auto-indexed

Tenant application · eviction, repairs, disturbance. Outcome: granted. A. The tenancy agreement between the parties shall terminate effective 5:00 p.m. on September 8, 2023. The Tenant and all occupants shall vacate the Residential Property by this time and date. B. A certified copy of this Order may be filed in the Supreme Court and enforced by She

Order text

Orders of the Director of Residential Tenancy Order LD23-410

Docket 23-551 and 23-552 September 1, 2023
Introduction
[1] On July 21, 2023, the Tenant filed a Tenant Application to Determine Dispute (Form 2A) (the “Application”) with the Residential Tenancy Office (the “Rental Office”). The Application was filed seeking:
To dispute a Notice of Termination (Form 4);
To request the landlord provide the tenancy agreement and/or other information required by the Act; and To request a determination that my landlord contravened my right to quiet enjoyment, entered the rental unit unlawfully, prohibited and/or restricted access to the rental unit, changed the locks or failed to secure the rental unit, failed to repair or maintain the rental unit, or any other material term of the tenancy agreement.
[2] Attached to the Application was an Eviction Notice (Form 4A) dated July 18, 2023, effective August 17, 2023, (the “Notice”). The Notice was served on the Tenant in person on July 18, 2023. The
Notice was served on the Tenant for the following reasons:
You or someone you have allowed on the property have disturbed or endangered others;
You or someone you have allowed on the property have engaged in illegal activity on the property;
You or someone you have allowed on the property has caused damage to the rental unit;
and You have sublet the rental unit without the landlord’s consent.
[3] On August 31, 2023, a teleconference hearing was held before a Residential Tenancy Officer (the “Officer”). The Tenant and the Representative participated. The Officer notes that the Tenant received a copy of the tenancy agreement in the evidence package. Therefore, the Officer does not need to make a determination on this matter.
Issues to be Decided
i. Did the Landlord contravene the Tenant’s right to quiet enjoyment, enter the rental unit unlawfully, prohibit and/or restrict access to the rental unit, change the locks or fail to secure the rental unit, fail to repair or maintain the rental unit, or any other material term of the tenancy agreement?
ii. Does the Tenant have to vacate the Residential Property due to the Notice?
Summary of the Evidence
[4] On September 1, 2022, the Tenant and the Landlord into a written fixed-term rental agreement for the Residential Property. The Residential Property consists of a single-family house. Rent is $884.00 per month due on the first day of the month. A security deposit was of $884.00 was paid.

Orders of the Director of Residential Tenancy Order LD23-410

Docket 23-551 and 23-552 September 1, 2023 Landlord’s Evidence and Submissions
[5] The Representative stated beginning the week of July 10, 2023, she started receiving complaints from the Tenant’s neighbours as the Tenant’s visitors were causing problems around the property.
On July 17, 2023, the Representative posted a 24-hour notice for inspection on the Tenant’s door.
A few hours later, the Representative received a call from the Tenant stating the police were at the Residential Property and that someone was trying to kill him.
[6] The Representative attended the property and she was invited inside by the Tenant. She spoke to “S.D.” who stated he was also living at the property. S.D. told the Representative that at least four other individuals were also living there. The Representative stated she did not give permission for S.D. or any other individuals to live at the property. The Representative submitted into evidence photographs of S.D.’s room and of other beds inside the property.
[7] S.D. told the Representative that the Tenant was allowing anyone wanting to “shoot up” to stay there. She stated she observed alcohol swabs in the property. S.D. told the Representative that the Tenant used the alcohol swabs when “shooting up.” S.D. also told the Representative that S.D.
sometimes “shoots up” Dilaudid.
[8] The Representative stated she observed dozens of holes in the walls and other damage to the Residential Property. The Representative submitted photographs of the damages into evidence.
The Representative stated she has observed Facebook videos of the Tenant damaging the property and submitted some screenshots of the videos into evidence. She stated the basement smells like urine. The Representative stated she posted a 24-hour inspection notice on the Tenant’s door recently but the Tenant had the doors barricaded and the Representative was not able to enter the property.
Tenant’s Evidence and Submissions
[9] The Tenant stated there is no evidence of illegal activities taking place at the property. The Tenant stated the drugs that S.D. are “shooting up” are prescribed. He stated the Representative removed a bottle of pills from inside the property when she was there. The Tenant stated the Representative entered the property prior to the 24-hour notice on July 17, 2023.
[10] The Tenant stated that one of the individuals that the Representative said was living at the property never lived there. The Tenant stated the damage to the property was minor and he had fixed some of the holes. He stated there was a broken window but the window is a poor design and is easy to break. He denied the basement smelled like urine and stated it was just humid. The Tenant stated he was just storing extra mattresses at the property.
Analysis
Breach of Tenant’s Quiet Enjoyment
[11] The Tenant stated the Landlord entered the rental unit on July 17, 2023, before the 24-hour
notice was up. The Landlord stated the Tenant called her to come to the property and she was invited in by the Tenant. Based on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Officer finds that the Tenant has not established, on a balance of probabilities, that the Landlord has contravened section 59 of the Act.

Orders of the Director of Residential Tenancy Order LD23-410

Docket 23-551 and 23-552 September 1, 2023
Notice of Termination
[12] The Landlord’s reasons for terminating the tenancy agreement are pursuant to sub-subsections
61.(1)(d)(i), (e), (f), (i) of the Act, which state:
61.(1) A landlord may end a tenancy by giving a notice of termination where one or more of the following applies:
(d) the tenant or a person permitted on the residential property by the tenant has (i) significantly interfered with or unreasonably disturbed another occupant or the landlord of the residential property, (e) the tenant or a person permitted on the residential property by the tenant has engaged in illegal activity that (i) has caused or is likely to cause damage to the landlord’s property, (ii) has adversely affected or is likely to adversely affect the quiet enjoyment, security, safety or physical well-being of another occupant of the residential property, or (iii) has jeopardized or is likely to jeopardize a lawful right or interest of the landlord or another occupant;
(f) the tenant or a person permitted on the residential property by the tenant has caused unreasonable damage to a rental unit or the residential property;
(i) the tenant purports to assign or sublet the rental unit without first obtaining the landlord’s written consent as required by section 30.
[13] The Representative testified there is evidence of holes in the walls and other damages inside the Residential Property. She stated there was evidence of drug use at the property and the Tenant is allowing other individuals to live at the property without the permission of the Representative. The Representative attempted to inspect the property recently but the Tenant barricaded the doors and the Representative could not enter.
[14] Based on the totality of the evidence the Officer finds the Landlord has established that the Tenant has breached subsections 61.(1)(d)(i), (e), (f), (i) of the Act and the Landlord has established a valid basis for terminating the tenancy agreement. Therefore, the Application is denied.
Conclusion
[15] The Notice is valid and the Application is denied.
[16] The tenancy agreement between the parties shall terminate effective 5:00 p.m. on September 8,
2023. The Tenant and all occupants shall vacate the Residential Property by this time and date.

Orders of the Director of Residential Tenancy Order LD23-410

Docket 23-551 and 23-552 September 1, 2023
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT
A. The tenancy agreement between the parties shall terminate effective 5:00 p.m. on September 8,
2023. The Tenant and all occupants shall vacate the Residential Property by this time and date.
B. A certified copy of this Order may be filed in the Supreme Court and enforced by Sheriff Services as permitted by the Act.
DATED at Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, this 1st day of September, 2023.
(sgd.) Mitchell King Mitchell King Residential Tenancy Officer
NOTICE
Right to Appeal
This Order can be appealed to the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission (the “Commission”) by serving a Notice of Appeal with the Commission and every party to this Order within 7 days of this Order. If a document is sent electronically after 5:00 p.m., it is considered received the next day that is not a holiday.
If a document is sent by mail, it is considered served on the third day after mailing.
Filing with the Court
If no appeal has been made within the noted timelines, this Order can be filed with the Supreme Court of Prince Edward Island and enforced as if it were an order of the Court.

Similar cases

Orders that share issues or RTA sections. Useful when comparing how similar facts were decided.

  • LD26-295granted · rto

    Landlord application · security deposit, compensation, rent arrears. Outcome: granted. The Landlord has established cleaning, repair and related claims totalling $4,006.28. [17] The Landlord has estab…

  • LD26-293granted · rto

    Application · eviction. Outcome: granted. I find that the Notice is invalid and the Application is allowed. The tenancy will continue and the Tenant may continue living in the Unit.

  • LD26-292partial · rto

    Tenant application · compensation, repairs. Outcome: partial. The Landlord must pay the Tenant $266.16 by the timeline below.

  • LD26-291partial · rto

    Landlord application · security deposit, compensation, rent arrears. Outcome: partial. The Tenant has established a claim for double the security deposit and security deposit interest, in the amount o…

  • LD26-289granted · rto

    Landlord application · eviction. Outcome: granted. I find that the Notice is valid and the Application is allowed. [12] The Tenants and all occupants must vacate the Unit and return the Unit’s keys to…

  • LD26-288partial · rto

    Landlord application · security deposit, compensation, repairs. Outcome: partial. The Tenants’ claims for double the security deposit and compensation are denied. [20] The Landlord’s claims are denied…

  • LR26-38dismissed · irac

    Landlord appeal · eviction, rent increase, compensation. Outcome: dismissed. The Landlord's appeal is allowed in part. The Commission substitutes a finding that the Occupation Notice is valid. The rem…

  • LD26-281dismissed · rto

    Application · eviction, rent arrears. Outcome: dismissed. 1. The Application is dismissed because the Rental Office does not have jurisdiction to determine the dispute between the Applicant and the Re…