← Back to orders

LR08-11

IRAC · August 21, 2008 · denied · Auto-indexed

Open saved PDFOriginal source ↗
Decision date
August 21, 2008
Outcome
denied
RTA sections
25, 11(1), 18, 26(2)

Quick summary

Auto-indexed

Appeal · other. Outcome: denied.

Linked prior order: LD08-232

Order text

Order LR08-11 - Rental Appeal - Docket LR08010 - Neil and Linda Snook v. Director of Residential Rental Property Docket LR08010 Order LR08-11 IN THE MATTER of an appeal, under Section 25 of the Rental of Residential Property Act , by Neil and Linda Snook against Order No. LD08-232 of the Director of Residential Rental Property, dated June 6, 2008. BEFORE THE COMMISSION on Thursday, the 21st day of August, 2008. John Broderick, Commissioner David Holmes, Commissioner Chester MacNeill, Commissioner Order Participants 1. Appellants: Neil Snook Linda Snook 2. Respondent: Darlene Sanderson Reasons for Order 1. Introduction The Appellants Neil and Linda Snooks (the Snooks) have appealed Order No. LD08-232 issued by the Office of the Director of Residential Rental Property (the Director) on June 6, 2008. The Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission (the Commission) received the Snook's Notice of Appeal (Exhibit E-17) on June 30, 2008. The Respondent Darlene Sanderson (Ms. Sanderson) filed a Form 2 Application for Enforcement of Statutory or Other Conditions of Rental Agreement on January 3, 2008. Ms. Sanderson sought a finding that rent was owed and an order that an amount found to be owed be paid. She noted the following particulars in support of her Form 2 application: Lessee didn't provide 1 month's notice. Amount of rent owing is $900.00 for Dec. 2007. The matter was heard before the Director on January 18, 2008. In Order LD08-232, the Director found that the evidence supported Ms. Sanderson's claim for rent for the month of December 2007, that rent in the amount of $900.00 was owed and that the Snooks were to pay $900.00 to Ms. Sanderson on or before June 30, 2008. This appeal was heard in the Commission's main hearing room in Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island on Wednesday, July 16, 2008. 2. Evidence The Snooks told the Commission that they gave Ms. Sanderson 30 days oral notice that they were terminating the rental agreement. Ms. Sanderson told the Commission that she received less than 30 days oral notice. There is no evidence before the Commission that the Snooks provided Ms. Sanderson with written notice that they were terminating the rental agreement. 3. Decision The Commission denies the appeal for the reasons that follow. Subsection 11(1) and section 18 of the Rental of Residential Property Act , R.S.P.E.I. 1988, Cap. R-13.1(the Act ) read as follows: 11. (1) A lessee may terminate a rental agreement, by serving on the lessor a notice of termination which complies with section 18. � 18. (1) A lessor and lessee shall give notice to terminate in writing in the form prescribed by regulation. (2) A notice to terminate (a) shall be signed by the person giving the notice, or his agent; (b) shall identify the premises in respect of which the notice is given; (c) shall state the date on which the notice is to be effective; and (d) where notice is given by the lessor, shall state the reasons for the termination. 1988,c.58,s.18. Emphasis added. The Commission wishes to point out that Schedule �B� to the Form 1 Standard Form of Rental Agreement specifies that a lessee may terminate a rental agreement by serving on the lessor a notice of termination which complies with section 18 of the Act . However, Schedule �B� to Form 1 would be more helpful to those unfamiliar with the Act if it specified that the notice must be in writing. That being said, the Act does require written notice and the evidence before the Commission establishes that the Snooks only provided oral notice of termination to Ms. Sanderson. The Commission does not have the authority to amend or temper clear requirements specified in the Act . Accordingly, the appeal is denied. The Commission hereby orders that Neil and Linda Snook pay Darlene Sanderson the sum of $900.00 for rent owing for the month of December 2007, said sum to be paid on or before August 29, 2008. Order WHEREAS the Appellants Neil and Linda Snook have appealed against Order No. LD08-232 of the Director of Residential Rental property, dated June 6, 2008; AND WHEREAS the Commission heard the appeal in Charlottetown on July 16, 2008; NOW THEREFORE , for the reasons given in the annexed Reasons for Order; IT IS ORDERED THAT 1. The appeal is denied. 2. The Appellants Neil and Linda Snook shall pay the Respondent Darlene Sanderson the sum of $900.00 for rent owing for the month of December 2007, said sum to be paid on or before August 29, 2008. DATED at Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, this 21st day of August, 2008. BY THE COMMISSION : John Broderick, Commissioner David Holmes, Commissioner Chester MacNeill, Commissioner NOTICE Sections 26.(2), 26.(3), 26.(4) and 26.(5) of the Rental of Residential Property Act provide as follows: 26.(2) A lessor or lessee may, within fifteen days of the decision of the Commission, appeal to the court on a question of law only. (3) The rules of court governing appeals apply to an appeal under subsection (2). (4) Where the Commission has confirmed, reversed or varied an order of the Director and no appeal has been taken within the time specified in subsection (2), the lessor or lessee may file the order in the court. (5) Where an order is filed pursuant to subsection (4), it may be enforced as if it were an order of the court.

Similar cases

Orders that share issues or RTA sections. Useful when comparing how similar facts were decided.

  • LD26-296granted · rto

    Tenant application · other. Outcome: granted. The Landlord must pay the Tenant $1,437.88 by the timeline below.

  • LD26-294granted · rto

    Application · other. Outcome: granted. I find that the Parking Spot is already an included service or facility in the Tenant’s rent. The Landlords must not charge the Tenant a separate fee regarding t…

  • LR26-37granted · irac

    Landlord appeal · other. Outcome: granted. The Appeal is denied and the Rental Office decision LD26-125 is confirmed. The Landlords and Bhaskar are liable to pay the Tenant a return of rent and double…

  • LR26-36dismissed · irac

    Appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The appeal is dismissed. The Commission agrees with the finding of Order LD26-130 that the parties did not have a landlord-tenant relationship, or a tenancy agreeme…

  • LR26-35dismissed · irac

    Tenant appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Appeal is denied and the Rental Office’s Order LD26-161 is upheld. The Tenant shall return the Subtenant’s security deposit in the amount of $500.00, plu…

  • LD26-238granted · rto

    Tenant application · other. Outcome: granted. The Landlord must pay the Tenant $2,256.15. This amount includes the original security deposit ($1,100.00), the $56.15 in accrued interest on the original…

  • LR26-34dismissed · irac

    Landlord appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Appeal is dismissed. Order LD26-118 is confirmed. The Landlord and Bhaskar remain jointly and severally liable to pay the Tenants a return of rent toge…

  • LR26-33dismissed · irac

    Landlord appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Appeal is dismissed. Order LD26-131 is confirmed. The Landlord and Bhaskar remain jointly and severally liable to pay the Tenant a return of rent toget…