← Back to orders

LR15-35

IRAC · November 16, 2015 · dismissed · Auto-indexed

Open saved PDFOriginal source ↗
Decision date
November 16, 2015
Panel / officer
M. Douglas Clow
Applicant
tenant
Tenant
Sarah Nicolle and Cody Nicolle
Outcome
dismissed
RTA sections
25, 25(1), 26(2)

Quick summary

Auto-indexed

Tenant appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed.

Linked prior order: LD15-124

Order text

Order LR15-35 - Rental Appeal - Docket LR15037 - Sarah Nicolle and Cody Nicolle v Director of Residential Rental Property Docket LR15037 Order LR15-35 IN THE MATTER of an appeal filed under Section 25 of the Rental of Residential Property Act by Sarah Nicolle and Cody Nicolle against Order LD15-124 issued by the Director of Residential Rental Property on the 10th day of April, 2015. BEFORE THE COMMISSION on Monday, the 16th day of November, 2015. M. Do uglas Clow, Vice-Chair John Broderick, Commissioner Order On November 3, 2015, the Commission received a Notice of Appeal from a lessee, Sarah Nicolle on behalf of herself and Cody Nicolle (the "Appellants"). As this Notice of Appeal form is pursuant to section 25 of the Rental of Residential Property Act , it would appear that the Appellants have requested an appeal of a previous decision of the Director of Residential Rental Property (the "Director"). However, no copy of a Director's Order was attached to the Appellants' Notice of Appeal. Attached to the Appellants' Notice of Appeal was a Satisfaction Piece issued by the Supreme Court of Prince Edward Island and signed by a lessor, Hilchie Quality Rentals Inc. (the "Respondent") dated the 18th day of September, 2015. Following the receipt of the Notice of Appeal with attached Satisfaction Piece, the Commission was advised by the Director that Order LD15-124 was issued on April 10, 2015. The Commission has reviewed said Order and the parties identified in said Order appear to be the same parties as set out in the Satisfaction Piece. The appeal is dismissed for the following reasons. With respect to the Appellants' apparent attempt to appeal Order LD15-124, the appeal was filed over six months after the Director issued said Order, which is well beyond the statutory time limit set out in subsection 25(1) of the Rental of Residential Property Act . Further, the statutory time period to appeal was specifically stated under the heading "NOTICE" on page three of Order LD15-124. With respect to the Appellants' inclusion of the Satisfaction Piece with the Notice of Appeal, the Satisfaction Piece was issued by the Supreme Court of Prince Edward Island and the Commission has absolutely no jurisdiction to hear appeals of matters which were previously determined by the Court. NOW THEREFORE , pursuant to the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Act and the Rental of Residential Property Act ; IT IS ORDERED THAT 1. The Commission does not have jurisdiction to hear this appeal. DATED at Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, this 16th day of November, 2015. BY THE COMMISSION : M. Douglas Clow, Vice-Chair John Broderick, Commissioner NOTICE Sections 26.(2), 26.(3), 26.(4) and 26.(5) of the Rental of Residential Property Act provide as follows: 26. (2) A lessor or lessee may, within fifteen days of the decision of the Commission, appeal to the court on a question of law only. (3) The rules of court governing appeals apply to an appeal under subsection (2). (4) Where the Commission has confirmed, reversed or varied an order of the Director and no appeal has been taken within the time specified in subsection (2), the lessor or lessee may file the order in the court. (5) Where an order is filed pursuant to subsection (4), it may be enforced as if it were an order of the court. NOTICE: IRAC File Retention In accordance with the Commission's Records Retention and Disposition Schedule, the material contained in the official file regarding this matter will be retained by the Commission for a period of 2 years.

Similar cases

Orders that share issues or RTA sections. Useful when comparing how similar facts were decided.

  • LD26-296granted · rto

    Tenant application · other. Outcome: granted. The Landlord must pay the Tenant $1,437.88 by the timeline below.

  • LD26-294granted · rto

    Application · other. Outcome: granted. I find that the Parking Spot is already an included service or facility in the Tenant’s rent. The Landlords must not charge the Tenant a separate fee regarding t…

  • LR26-37granted · irac

    Landlord appeal · other. Outcome: granted. The Appeal is denied and the Rental Office decision LD26-125 is confirmed. The Landlords and Bhaskar are liable to pay the Tenant a return of rent and double…

  • LR26-36dismissed · irac

    Appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The appeal is dismissed. The Commission agrees with the finding of Order LD26-130 that the parties did not have a landlord-tenant relationship, or a tenancy agreeme…

  • LR26-35dismissed · irac

    Tenant appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Appeal is denied and the Rental Office’s Order LD26-161 is upheld. The Tenant shall return the Subtenant’s security deposit in the amount of $500.00, plu…

  • LD26-238granted · rto

    Tenant application · other. Outcome: granted. The Landlord must pay the Tenant $2,256.15. This amount includes the original security deposit ($1,100.00), the $56.15 in accrued interest on the original…

  • LR26-34dismissed · irac

    Landlord appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Appeal is dismissed. Order LD26-118 is confirmed. The Landlord and Bhaskar remain jointly and severally liable to pay the Tenants a return of rent toge…

  • LR26-33dismissed · irac

    Landlord appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Appeal is dismissed. Order LD26-131 is confirmed. The Landlord and Bhaskar remain jointly and severally liable to pay the Tenant a return of rent toget…