← Back to orders

LR17-04

IRAC · June 7, 2017 · denied · Auto-indexed

Open saved PDFOriginal source ↗
Decision date
June 7, 2017
Applicant
tenant
Tenant
Julie Gaudet
Outcome
denied
Issues
eviction
RTA sections
25, 16, 13, 6, 16(3), 26(2)

Quick summary

Auto-indexed

Tenant appeal · eviction. Outcome: denied.

Linked prior order: LD17-142

Order text

Order LR17-04 - Rental Appeal - Docket LR17008 - Julie Gaudet v Director of Residential Rental Property Docket LR17008 Order LR17-04 IN THE MATTER of an appeal under Section 25 of the Rental of Residential Property Act by Julie Gaudet against Order LD17-142 dated May 29, 2017 issued by the Office of the Director of Residential Rental Property. BEFORE THE COMMISSION on Wednesday, the 7th day of June, 2017. John Broderick, Commissioner Jean Tingley, Commissioner Order BACKGROUND On May 30, 2017 the Commission received a Notice of Appeal from a lessee, Julie Gaudet (the "Appellant"), requesting an appeal of Order LD17-142 dated May 29, 2017 issued by the Director of Residential Rental Property (the "Director"). By way of background, on May 18, 2017, Ming Qi ("Mr. Qi") on behalf of a lessor, TTM�s Fast Food Ltd. (the "Respondent"), filed with the Director a Form 2 - Application for Enforcement of Statutory or Other Conditions of Rental Agreement to which was attached a Form 4 - Notice of Termination by Lessor of Rental Agreement dated April 18, 2017 signed by Mr. Qi. The matter was heard by the Director on May 26, 2017 and in Order LD17-142 the Director ordered: "IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT Possession of the residential premises be surrendered to the lessor and the Sheriff is directed to put the lessor in possession of the residential premises on Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 2:00 PM." The Commission heard the appeal on June 6, 2017. The Appellant was present and Mr. Qi represented the Respondent. Michael Gaudet testified for the Appellant. Jason Smith and Arron Gaudet testified for the Respondent. EVIDENCE The Appellant and Michael Gaudet testified as to various events. The Appellant testified that she was preoccupied with a very important matter during the time that the Form 4 was served and thus she missed filing a Form 6 within the ten day time period. Mr. Qi, on behalf of the Respondent, called Jason Smith and Arron Gaudet to testify. Their testimony countered the testimony offered by the Appellant and Michael Gaudet. DECISION The appeal is denied for the reasons that follow. Section 16 of the Rental of Residential Property Act (the Act ) reads as follows: 16. (1) A lessee who has received notice of termination for any of the reasons set out in section 13, 14 or 15 may apply to the Director for an order setting aside the notice. (2) An application under subsection (1) shall be made by a lessee not later than ten days after being served with the notice. (3) Where the lessee does not bring an application to set aside the notice, he shall be deemed to have accepted the termination on the effective date of the notice. (4) The lessee shall serve the lessor with a copy of an application of the lessee under subsection (1). 1988,c.58,s.16; 1990,c.53,s.6 . Emphasis added. The Commission finds that the Appellant did not file with the Director a Form 6 Application to Set Aside in response to the April 18, 2017 Form 4 Notice of Termination. Section 16 of the Act requires that the Form 6 shall be filed within ten days of being served with said Form 4. Therefore, pursuant to subsection 16(3) of the Act , the Appellant is deemed to have accepted the termination date contained on the Form 4 Notice of Termination. The Commission agrees with the Director that the Act does not give the Director or the Commission the jurisdiction to extend the timeframe in which a lessee can make application to set aside the Notice of Termination. Accordingly, the Commission agrees with the findings of the Director in Order LD17-142 and the appeal is denied. NOW THEREFORE , pursuant to the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Act and the Rental of Residential Property Act ; IT IS ORDERED THAT The a ppeal is denied. Director's Order LD17-1 42 is hereby confirmed in its entirety. DATED at Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, this 7 th day of June , 2017 . BY THE COMMISSION : John Broderick Commissioner Jean Tingley, Commisisoner NOTICE Sections 26.(2), 26.(3), 26.(4) and 26.(5) of the Rental of Residential Property Act provide as follows: 26.(2) A lessor or lessee may, within fifteen days of the decision of the Commission, appeal to the court on a question of law only. (3) The rules of court governing appeals apply to an appeal under subsection (2). (4) Where the Commission has confirmed, reversed or varied an order of the Director and no appeal has been taken within the time specified in subsection (2), the lessor or lessee may file the order in the court. (5) Where an order is filed pursuant to subsection (4), it may be enforced as if it were an order of the court. NOTICE: IRAC File Retention In accordance with the Commission's Records Retention and Disposition Schedule, the material contained in the official file regarding this matter will be retained by the Commission for a period of 2 years.

Similar cases

Orders that share issues or RTA sections. Useful when comparing how similar facts were decided.

  • LD26-293granted · rto

    Application · eviction. Outcome: granted. I find that the Notice is invalid and the Application is allowed. The tenancy will continue and the Tenant may continue living in the Unit.

  • LD26-289granted · rto

    Landlord application · eviction. Outcome: granted. I find that the Notice is valid and the Application is allowed. [12] The Tenants and all occupants must vacate the Unit and return the Unit’s keys to…

  • LR26-38dismissed · irac

    Landlord appeal · eviction, rent increase, compensation. Outcome: dismissed. The Landlord's appeal is allowed in part. The Commission substitutes a finding that the Occupation Notice is valid. The rem…

  • LD26-281dismissed · rto

    Application · eviction, rent arrears. Outcome: dismissed. 1. The Application is dismissed because the Rental Office does not have jurisdiction to determine the dispute between the Applicant and the Re…

  • LD26-279granted · rto

    Landlord application · eviction, rent arrears. Outcome: granted. The Notice is valid and the Tenants and all occupants must vacate the Unit by the timeline below.

  • LD26-275granted · rto

    Application · eviction, disturbance, illegal activity. Outcome: granted. I find that the Notice is invalid and the Application is allowed. The tenancy will continue and the Tenant can continue living …

  • LD26-274granted · rto

    Landlord application · eviction, disturbance. Outcome: granted. The Notice is valid and the Tenant and all occupants must vacate the Unit by the timeline below.

  • LD26-268granted · rto

    Application · eviction, disturbance, illegal activity. Outcome: granted. The tenancy will continue in full force and effect.