← Back to orders

LR13-08

IRAC · June 6, 2013 · unknown · Auto-indexed

Open saved PDFOriginal source ↗
Decision date
June 6, 2013
RTA sections
26(2)

Quick summary

Auto-indexed

Appeal · other. Outcome: outcome pending review.

Linked prior order: LR11-32

Order text

Order LR13-08 - Rental Appeal - Docket LR11028 - Supplement to Order LR11-32 - June 6, 2013 Docket LR11028 Order LR13-08 IN THE MATTER of a supplement to Order LR11-32 , issued by the Commission on November 1, 2011. BEFORE THE COMMISSION on Thursday, the 6th day of June, 2013. John Broderick, Commissioner Leonard Gallant, Commissioner Ferne MacPhail, Commissioner Order On November 1, 2011, the Commission issued Order LR11-32 after holding a public hearing on October 28, 2011. In Order LR11-32 the Commission had stated the following: "The Commission notes that the Respondent's testimony states that if there had not been complaints of social problems by neighbours, the Respondent may have been willing to grant additional time and may have entered into a new payment agreement with the Appellant. It may very well be said that there is an expectation that a social housing agency will show more tolerance to its clients than that expected from a private, for profit landlord." The Commission seeks to clarify the intended meaning of the last sentence of the paragraph quoted above from Order LR11-32 . While there may be an expectation from tenants and perhaps the general public that a social housing agency will show "more tolerance" to a tenant than a "private, for profit landlord", the Commission wishes to make it clear that there is no legal requirement for a social housing agency to do so. Neither the Rental of Residential Property Act nor the common law imposes any such obligation on a social housing agency. NOW THEREFORE , pursuant to the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Act and the Rental of Residential Property Act ; IT IS ORDERED THAT 1. The Commission hereby clarifies Order LR11-32 by stating that there is no legal requirement for a social housing agency to show more tolerance to a tenant than what would be reasonably expected from a private, for profit landlord. DATED at Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, the 6th day of June, 2013. BY THE COMMISSION : John Broderick, Commissioner Leonard Gallant, Commissioner Ferne MacPhail, Commissioner NOTICE Sections 26.(2), 26.(3), 26.(4) and 26.(5) of the Rental of Residential Property Act provide as follows: 26.(2) A lessor or lessee may, within fifteen days of the decision of the Commission, appeal to the court on a question of law only. (3) The rules of court governing appeals apply to an appeal under subsection (2). (4) Where the Commission has confirmed, reversed or varied an order of the Director and no appeal has been taken within the time specified in subsection (2), the lessor or lessee may file the order in the court. (5) Where an order is filed pursuant to subsection (4), it may be enforced as if it were an order of the court. NOTICE: IRAC File Retention In accordance with the Commission's Records Retention and Disposition Schedule, the material contained in the official file regarding this matter will be retained by the Commission for a period of 2 years.

Similar cases

Orders that share issues or RTA sections. Useful when comparing how similar facts were decided.

  • LD26-296granted · rto

    Tenant application · other. Outcome: granted. The Landlord must pay the Tenant $1,437.88 by the timeline below.

  • LD26-294granted · rto

    Application · other. Outcome: granted. I find that the Parking Spot is already an included service or facility in the Tenant’s rent. The Landlords must not charge the Tenant a separate fee regarding t…

  • LR26-37granted · irac

    Landlord appeal · other. Outcome: granted. The Appeal is denied and the Rental Office decision LD26-125 is confirmed. The Landlords and Bhaskar are liable to pay the Tenant a return of rent and double…

  • LR26-36dismissed · irac

    Appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The appeal is dismissed. The Commission agrees with the finding of Order LD26-130 that the parties did not have a landlord-tenant relationship, or a tenancy agreeme…

  • LR26-35dismissed · irac

    Tenant appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Appeal is denied and the Rental Office’s Order LD26-161 is upheld. The Tenant shall return the Subtenant’s security deposit in the amount of $500.00, plu…

  • LD26-238granted · rto

    Tenant application · other. Outcome: granted. The Landlord must pay the Tenant $2,256.15. This amount includes the original security deposit ($1,100.00), the $56.15 in accrued interest on the original…

  • LR26-34dismissed · irac

    Landlord appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Appeal is dismissed. Order LD26-118 is confirmed. The Landlord and Bhaskar remain jointly and severally liable to pay the Tenants a return of rent toge…

  • LR26-33dismissed · irac

    Landlord appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Appeal is dismissed. Order LD26-131 is confirmed. The Landlord and Bhaskar remain jointly and severally liable to pay the Tenant a return of rent toget…