← Back to orders

LR12-10

IRAC · March 15, 2012 · granted · Auto-indexed

Open saved PDFOriginal source ↗
Decision date
March 15, 2012
Panel / officer
Allan Rankin
Outcome
granted
Issues
eviction
RTA sections
25, 26(2)

Quick summary

Auto-indexed

Appeal · eviction. Outcome: granted.

Linked prior order: LD12-054

Order text

Order LR12-10 - Rental Appeal - Docket LR12006 -Cheryl Chandler v Director of Residential Rental Property Docket LR12006 Order LR12-10 IN THE MATTER of an appeal, under Section 25 of the Rental of Residential Property Act , by Cheryl Chandler against Order LD12-054 issued by the Director of Residential Rental Property dated February 27, 2012. BEFORE THE COMMISSION on Thursday, the 15th day of March, 2012. Allan Rankin, Vice-Chair Leonard Gallant, Commissioner Jean Tingley, Commissioner Order BACKGROUND On March 8, 2012 the Commission received a Notice of Appeal dated the same day from Cheryl Chandler (the Appellant) requesting an appeal of Order LD12-054 dated February 27, 2012 said Order issued by the Director of Residential Rental Property (the Director). By way of background, on February 10, 2012 the Appellant filed with the Director a Form 6 - Application by Lessee to Set Aside Notice of Termination to which was attached a Form 4 - Notice of Termination by Lessor of Rental Agreement dated February 5, 2012 signed by KEM Holdings Inc. (the Respondent). The matter was heard by the Director on February 21, 2012. In Order LD12-054 the Director ordered: " IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT 1. The Lessee's application to set aside the Notice of Termination is denied. 2. The Notice of Termination by Lessor of Rental Agreement dated February 5, 2012 to be effective February 25, 2012 is valid. 3. The rental agreement between the lessee and the lessor for the residential premises is hereby terminated as of midnight, February 29, 2012. The lessee must vacate the residential premises on or before this time and date." THE HEARING The appeal was scheduled to be heard by the Commission on March 15, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. The hearing commenced and the Appellant was not present. Edward and Linda Menzie were present to represent the Respondent. Commission staff telephoned the Appellant who advised that she had moved out of the residential premises and therefore saw no need to attend her appeal hearing. As the Appellant was aware of the date, time and location of the hearing yet chose not to attend her appeal, the Commission finds that the Appellant has abandoned her appeal and the Commission hereby confirms Order LD12-054 in its entirety. NOW THEREFORE , pursuant to the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Act and the Rental of Residential Property Act ; IT IS ORDERED THAT 1. The appeal is hereby deemed to be abandoned. 2. Director's Order LD12-054 is confirmed in its entirety. DATED at Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, the 15th day of March, 2012. BY THE COMMISSION : Allan Rankin, Vice-Chair Leonard Gallant, Commissioner Jean Tingley, Commissioner NOTICE Sections 26.(2), 26.(3), 26.(4) and 26.(5) of the Rental of Residential Property Act provide as follows: 26.(2) A lessor or lessee may, within fifteen days of the decision of the Commission, appeal to the court on a question of law only. (3) The rules of court governing appeals apply to an appeal under subsection (2). (4) Where the Commission has confirmed, reversed or varied an order of the Director and no appeal has been taken within the time specified in subsection (2), the lessor or lessee may file the order in the court. (5) Where an order is filed pursuant to subsection (4), it may be enforced as if it were an order of the court. NOTICE: IRAC File Retention In accordance with the Commission's Records Retention and Disposition Schedule, the material contained in the official file regarding this matter will be retained by the Commission for a period of 2 years.

Similar cases

Orders that share issues or RTA sections. Useful when comparing how similar facts were decided.

  • LD26-293granted · rto

    Application · eviction. Outcome: granted. I find that the Notice is invalid and the Application is allowed. The tenancy will continue and the Tenant may continue living in the Unit.

  • LD26-289granted · rto

    Landlord application · eviction. Outcome: granted. I find that the Notice is valid and the Application is allowed. [12] The Tenants and all occupants must vacate the Unit and return the Unit’s keys to…

  • LR26-38dismissed · irac

    Landlord appeal · eviction, rent increase, compensation. Outcome: dismissed. The Landlord's appeal is allowed in part. The Commission substitutes a finding that the Occupation Notice is valid. The rem…

  • LD26-281dismissed · rto

    Application · eviction, rent arrears. Outcome: dismissed. 1. The Application is dismissed because the Rental Office does not have jurisdiction to determine the dispute between the Applicant and the Re…

  • LD26-279granted · rto

    Landlord application · eviction, rent arrears. Outcome: granted. The Notice is valid and the Tenants and all occupants must vacate the Unit by the timeline below.

  • LD26-275granted · rto

    Application · eviction, disturbance, illegal activity. Outcome: granted. I find that the Notice is invalid and the Application is allowed. The tenancy will continue and the Tenant can continue living …

  • LD26-274granted · rto

    Landlord application · eviction, disturbance. Outcome: granted. The Notice is valid and the Tenant and all occupants must vacate the Unit by the timeline below.

  • LD26-268granted · rto

    Application · eviction, disturbance, illegal activity. Outcome: granted. The tenancy will continue in full force and effect.